The Boundaries of the Force Majeure Defense in Civil Disputes: A Study of Decision Number 162/PDT/2021/PT DPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i2.1165Keywords:
force majeure, contract, civil dispute, boundaries, legal liabilityAbstract
A contract forms the legal relationship between parties that creates binding rights and obligations as regulated in Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPer). However, the performance of a contract may be hindered by events beyond human can control, known as force majeure. Under Articles 1244 and 1245 of the Civil Code, a party who fails to fulfill its obligations due to force majeure may be released from liability for damages. This study aims to analyze the limits of force majeure as a legal defense in civil disputes through a case study of Decision Number 162/PDT/2021/PT DPS between PT Royal Pacific Nusantara and PT Lorenz Marble. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, using primary legal materials such as the Civil Code and court decisions, as well as secondary materials including legal books and scholarly journals related to force majeure. The results indicate that the court recognized the Covid-19 pandemic as a relative force majeure, which temporarily hinders the performance of contractual obligations but does not permanently extinguish them. The judges found that the defendant was not negligent, as they demonstrated good faith and efforts to fulfill obligations despite global disruptions. Thus, the boundaries of force majeure as a defense are determined by the causal relationship between extraordinary events and the inability to perform, along with the good faith of the party invoking the defense.
References
Agtha, E., & Novera, A. (2020). Keadaan Kahar Akibat Covid-19 dan Penerapannya Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Applicable Innovation of Engineering and Science Research (AVoER), 188–193.
Atim, Z. A. H., & Al-Qahum, A. (2023). Legislative Sustainability of the Contract for the Sale of Goods in the Saudi Sy1stem and International Agreements. Kurdish Studies, 11(3), 553–568.
Cormacain, R. (2020). Keeping Covid-19 emergency legislation socially distant from ordinary legislation: principles for the structure of emergency legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(3), 245–265.
Ihsanuddin, S. (2023). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Global Shipping Industry Ditinjau dari Perspektif Etika Bisnis Islam. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Kirtan, T., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., & Fadlan, F. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Pencantuman Klausul Force Majeure dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa dan Pengelolaan Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun Untuk Meneguhkan Kepastian Hukum (Studi Penelitian Di Kota Batam). UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3526–3548. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1154
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Maulidi, M. A. (2019). Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Questioning the Executorial Force on Final and Binding Decision of. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(2).
Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Sinaga, N. A., & Darwis, N. (2020). Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya Dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 7(2).
Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (1994). Terjemahan KUH Perdata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Made Cinta Mutiara, Ferdi Raditya Akbar, Hanifah Qurrotu Aini, Fransisca Dealova Andriyanto, Juniartha Gladys, Muhamad Davindra Azhar, Muhammad Arkan Alfarel, Fayza Azmina, Wardani Rizkianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
