Juridical Review of the Crime of Transferring the Object of Fiduciary Guarantee Without the Consent of the Fiduciary Recipient

Authors

  • George Johanes Paulus Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Noenik Soekorini Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • M. Syahrul Borman Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1337

Keywords:

Fiduciary Security; Criminal Liability; Transfer of Fiduciary Objects; Consumer Financing; Indonesian Criminal Law

Abstract

This study examines the criminal act of transferring fiduciary collateral objects without the prior written consent of the fiduciary recipient as regulated under Indonesian law. The rapid development of consumer financing practices has increased the use of fiduciary guarantees, particularly in credit agreements involving movable assets. However, in practice, debtors often transfer, pledge, or lease fiduciary objects to third parties without authorization, which constitutes a criminal offense under Law Number 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, analyzing primary legal materials in the form of legislation and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials from legal literature and scholarly works. The study focuses on the regulation of such criminal acts and the form of criminal liability imposed on fiduciary grantors who violate fiduciary provisions. The findings indicate that the transfer of fiduciary collateral without the consent of the fiduciary recipient fulfills the elements of a criminal offense as stipulated in Article 36 of the Fiduciary Security Law. Criminal liability may be imposed if the perpetrator is proven to have acted unlawfully, intentionally or negligently, and without any justification or excuse that eliminates criminal responsibility. This research concludes that the existing legal framework provides legal certainty and protection for creditors, although stricter supervision and legal awareness are necessary to prevent recurring violations in fiduciary practices.

References

Arief, B. N. (2018). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Chazawi, A. (2016). Hukum pidana positif Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press.

Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum jaminan utang: Jaminan fidusia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hamzah, A. (2019). Hukum pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Ilyas, A. (2018). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2010). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Nasution, B. J. (2021). Tindak pidana pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia tanpa persetujuan penerima fidusia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2), 233–249.

Prasetyo, T. (2019). Hukum pidana. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1315 K/Pid.Sus/2020.

Republik Indonesia. (1981). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76.

Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 168.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.

Sari, D. P. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban pidana debitur dalam pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 45–60.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sutrisno, E. (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi penerima fidusia terhadap pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia secara melawan hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(2), 189–205.

Widodo. (2021). Pengalihan objek jaminan fidusia sebagai tindak pidana. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 40(1), 77–92.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-22

How to Cite

Paulus, G. J., Soekorini, N., & Borman, M. S. (2026). Juridical Review of the Crime of Transferring the Object of Fiduciary Guarantee Without the Consent of the Fiduciary Recipient. Rechtsvinding, 4(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1337

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.