Criminal Procedure Procedure Anomalies in Modern Legal Dynamics: The Urgency of Legislative Reform to Ensure Legal Certainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1371Keywords:
KUHAP; Legal Reform; Legal Certainty; Digitization of the JudiciaryAbstract
The implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Indonesia still faces various structural and normative challenges, which are reflected in the procedural anomalies that occur in the field. These anomalies, such as unclear detention and investigation procedures, have created legal uncertainty that harms human rights and lowers the credibility of the criminal justice system. This study aims to identify gaps in the Criminal Code and assess the urgency of legislative reform needed to address these problems. The approach used in this study is a qualitative literature study, by analyzing various literature sources that include books, scientific articles, and relevant research reports. The findings of the study show that uncertainty in the duration of detention, weaknesses in the protection of suspects' rights, and the unpreparedness of the Indonesian legal system to accommodate modern technology are the main factors that worsen the effectiveness of the justice system. Therefore, comprehensive reform of the Criminal Procedure Code, including harmonization with international standards, technological integration through legal digitalization (e-Justice), and strengthening the independence of judicial institutions, is an urgent need to improve legal certainty, transparency, and human rights protection. The recommendations put forward in this study include expanding oversight of law enforcement officials, drafting regulations that accommodate electronic evidence, and public involvement in formulating legal policies to create a fairer and more efficient justice system.
References
Agustianti Tangahu. (2025). Criticism of the Effectiveness of Pretrial in Protecting Human Rights Under the Criminal Code. Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(02), 409–417. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Justi/article/view/6592
Boon-Kuo, L. (2024). The private harms of detention: why Serco’s violence is not criminalised. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 36(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2318520
Djamaludin, D., Aziz, M. F., Ar-Rasyid, Y., & As-Sayyis, I. A. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082
Hutahayan, B., Fadli, M., Amimakmur, S. A., & Dewantara, R. (2024). Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2332950. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950
Ifra, I. H. (2023). Overstaying Tahanan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Retrieved January 27, 2026, from Directorate General of Corrections website: https://www.ditjenpas.go.id/overstaying-tahanan-dalam-sistem-peradilan-pidana
Irvita, M., & Asriani, A. (2025). Transparency and accountability in the justice system: Building public trust and justice: The Role of Public Trust in Fair Law Enforcement. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(4), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i4.367
Jufri, S., Yasmin, M., Fitria, I., Cahyani, A., & Adhilia, L. T. F. (2024). Dimensions of Judges Independence in The Judicial Process. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 6(3), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51651
Marrismawati, C. S., Asriyani, A., Rusdi, M., & ... (2024). Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Tantangan dan Solusi Menuju Keadilan Efektif. Jurnal Litigasi, 11(2018), 377–382. Retrieved from http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/415%0Ahttps://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/download/415/302
Muttaqi, N. I. N. (2025). Urgensi Integrasi Pengaturan Restorative Justice dalam RUU KUHAP sebagai Bentuk Reformasi Keadilan Nabila Ihza Nur Muttaqi * Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta , Yogyakarta , Indonesia , PENDAHULUAN Hukum dipandang sebagai suatu aturan yang bers. LEX RENAISSANCE, 10(August), 168–196.
Nasution, F., Sulistiani, L., & Putri, N. S. (2025). Praktik Penahanan Tersangka Dalam Kasus yang Diancam Pidana Dibawah 5 Tahun oleh UU ITE Dikaitkan Dengan Alasan Penahanan Berdasarkan KUHAP. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4), 1–15.
Ningsih, E. P. (2024). Protection of Human Rights in the Investigation Process Criminal Offenses in Indonesia. Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian, 1(2), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.62872/g9297g96
Oktaviandra, S. (2025). Revisiting The Interpretation of The Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code: Legal Basis for Witnessteleconferencing. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 14(1), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.14.1.2025.161-190
Padang, K., & Surajiman. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (Studi Kasus: Perusakan Masjid Ahmadiyah di Kab. Sintang, Prov. Kalimantan Barat). JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES (JILS), 6(1), 54–65.
Pascawati, F. A., Djatmika, P., & Istiqomah, M. (2024). Urgency of Exclusionary Rules Regulation in Indonesian Criminal Justice System. LEGAL HORIZONS, 22(3), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2024.3.pp.20-33
Salsabila, K. A., & Sumardiana, B. (2025). Analisis Terhadap Efektivitas Batas Waktu Penyidikan Dalam KUHAP Kepada Perlindungan HAM Tersangka. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 8(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v8i1.6096
Setyadi, H. B., & Masyhar, A. (2025). Legal Politics in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Indonesia. Journal of Literature Review, 1(1), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.63822/320mhd19
Tatas, J., Nugroho, B., Roesli, M., & Asasi, H. (2025). Upaya Paksa Penahanan pada Perkara Pidana pada Tingkat Penyidikan. PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(6), 8617–8628.
Trisnanti, I. L., Amelia, M., & Sushanty, V. R. (2025). the Role of Globalization in Legal Reform in Indonesia. Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement, 4(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v4i1.746
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhamad Zaenal Arifin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




