Reinterpretation of the Principle of Family, Chapter 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in the Era of Platform Capitalism within the Framework of the Modern Economy of the 21st Century

Authors

  • KM Ibnu Shina Zaenudin Universitas Sali Al-Aitaam, Bandung
  • Rika Nurhayati Universitas Sali Al-Aitaam, Bandung
  • Bakar Bakar Universitas Sali Al-Aitaam, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1404

Keywords:

Big data, Digital economy, Digital oligarchy, Economy circulation

Abstract

The modern economy, which relies on Big Data architecture and sophisticated algorithms, presents a disturbing information loop in today's development landscape. This research uses a normative-empirical legal research method (socio-legal research) with a contextual and comparative approach. Philosophically, the principle of kinship in Chapter 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia rejects the liberal anthropological view that views humans solely as rational, selfish, profit-seeking creatures. In relation to the implementation of the contemporary social function of the digital economy, this demands a bold regulatory strategy to counter the concentration of power in the digital oligarchy. The first strategy is to redefine data ownership through the establishment of Data Cooperatives or Data Trusts. By making workers the owners of the platform, profits no longer flow abroad or to a handful of investors but circulate back into the worker community itself, creating a healthy and equitable economic circulation as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

References

Azky, W. (2019). Surveillance capitalism: Dari penjajahan data pribadi hingga komodifikasi. Unair news. https://news.unair.ac.id/2019/12/30/surveillance-capitalism-dari-penjajahan-data-pribadi-hingga-komodifikasi/

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: Norton.

Hanifah, N.J., Alya, R., Amalia, T., dan Kuncara, A.B. (2025). Keadilan sebagai tujuan hukum: Telaah teori keadilan John Rawls dalam konteks hukum Indonesia. Prosiding: Label: Vol. 2 (1): 228 – 232.

Hatta, M. (2004). Demokrasi Kita. Balai Pustaka. Jakarta.

Madung, O. G. (2020). Krisis Demokrasi dan Tirani Meritokrasi Menurut Michael Sandel. Jurnal Ledalero Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Katolik Ledalero Flores. Vol. 19 (2).

Narjono, A.I. (2025). Membedah relevansi Pasal 33 UUD 1945 dalam sistem ekonomi modern: Suatu studi linteratur. Jurnal studi ekonomi dan bisnis islam. Vol. 7 (2): 160 – 175.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. New York.

Soeprapto, S. (1995). Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Notonegoro. Jurnal Filsafat.

Sonata, D.L. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unila Lampung. Vol. 8 (1): 15-35.

Susanti, I. (2022). Ketimpangan Digital dan Demokrasi Ekonomi. Jurnal Transformasi Ekonomi Digital. Vol. 2 (1): 45–59.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 33 ayat 1.

Yuliana, F. (2020). Makna Pasal 33 UUD 1945 dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 17 (4): 725–744.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

Zaenudin, K. I. S., Nurhayati, R., & Bakar, B. (2026). Reinterpretation of the Principle of Family, Chapter 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in the Era of Platform Capitalism within the Framework of the Modern Economy of the 21st Century. Rechtsvinding, 4(1), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1404

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.