The Effectiveness of 2023 Recess Outcomes from Lima Puluh Kota Regency Regional House of Representatives Members in the Formulation of the 2025 Regional Budget
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.2018Keywords:
Lima Puluh Kota Regency, Recess, Regional House of Representatives (DPRD)Abstract
Recess activities undertaken by Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) members can be followed up through the formulation of DPRD key points of thought. These key points represent an analysis of regional development issues derived from public hearing minutes and/or meetings held to gather constituent aspirations during the recess period. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the 2023 recess outcomes from Lima Puluh Kota Regency DPRD members regarding the formulation of the 2025 Regional Budget (APBD) in accordance with Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 86 of 2017 as well as to identify the factors preventing these outcomes from being accommodated and realized in the 2025 APBD and to propose solutions. This research employs a descriptive approach utilizing a socio-legal (empirical-juridical) method. Data sources comprise both primary and secondary data, which were analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the 2023 recess outcomes from Lima Puluh Kota Regency DPRD members were not yet effective in the context of the 2025 APBD formulation, as they failed to meet the five assessment indicators derived from Sutrisno’s program effectiveness theory. The factors preventing the accommodation and realization of these recess outcomes in the 2025 APBD include both internal and external elements. Proposed solutions involve enhancing the capacity of DPRD members through technical guidance, strengthening coordination, conducting preliminary verification of recess outcomes, ensuring all proposals are accompanied by supporting documentation, establishing a priority scale, and intensifying DPRD oversight and monitoring of verified key points of thought through to the APBD deliberation stage.
References
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016).
Dadang Suwanda, Optimalisasi Fungsi Penganggaran DPRD Dalam Penyusunan PERDA APBD (Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2016).
Lusia Palulungan, dkk. Panduan Reses Partisipatif, (Makassar:Yayasan Bakti, 2018).
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017).
Prianto, W. (2024). Analisis Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Teori Norma Hukum Oleh Hans Kelsen Dan Hans Nawiasky. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 8–19. https://jurnal.unusultra.ac.id/index.php/jisdik
Sagala, P., Prasetyo, A. K., Sarumaha, A., & Sudirman. (2025). Pergeseran Paradigma Hukum Positivis: Rekonstruksi Substansi Hukum Nasional yang Berlandaskan Pancasila (Perspektif Staatfundamentalnorm). Jurnal Legisla, 22(1), 97–112.
Salminawati, & Hasibuan, F. H. (2021). Epistemologi Perspektif Barat & Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 11190–11199.
Shaleh, A. I., & Wisnaeni, F. (2019). Hubungan Agama Dan Negara Menurut Pancasila Dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i2.237-249
Sikumbang, S. M., Sjarif, F. A., & Salampessy, M. Y. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Pengetahuan Perundang- undangan (1st ed.). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Silalahi, A. D. (2024). Paradoks Ide Negara Hukum dalam Justifikasi Filosofis Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(1), 63–76.
Simarmata, R. (2008). Penelitian Hukum: Dari Monodisipliner Ke Interdisipliner. Rsialah Hukum, 1(1), 48–53.
Siregar, M. H., & Muharam, S. (2022). Penataan Sistem Hukum dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Pancasila sebagai Sumber Segala Sumber Hukum Negara. YUDABBIRU: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 4(2), 104–118.
Suprapto, M. F. I. (2020). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan I: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan (Edisi Revi). Kanisius.
Susanti, D. O., & Efendi, A. (2021). Pancasila dalam Teori Jenjang Norma Hukum Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 514–525.
Trinanda, D., Yuliandri, & Fahmi, K. (2022). Problematika TAP MPR dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Peluang Judicial Review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 396–409.
ulaiman, K. F. (2016). Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Oleh Mahkamah Agung dan Pemerintah Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia. Disertasi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Wikandaru, R., Lasiyo, & Sayuti, S. A. (2019). Ontologi Pathet: Kajian Kritis terhadap Pathet sebagai Representasi Norma Ontologis Transedental dalam Pergelaran Wayang. Jurnal Filsafat, 29(2), 244–274.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khairispen Waldi, Edi Haskar , Nessa Fajriyana Farda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
