Maqāṣid al-Syarī'ah's Analysis of Assisted Reproduction Arrangements in Article 111 of Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024

Authors

  • Choiriyah Nur Rohmah International Open University, Serrekunda
  • Ridwan Setiyono Institut Islam Mambaul ‘Ulum, Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.2021

Keywords:

Maqāṣid al-Syarī'ah; Assisted Reproductive Technology; In Vitro Fertilization; al- Ḍarūriyyāt al-Khams

Abstract

Having children is a primary goal of marriage, but infertility prevents many couples from conceiving naturally. Medical advances such as Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) like in vitro fertilization (IVF) offer solutions but also raise ethical and legal dilemmas, particularly concerning lineage clarity, the sanctity of marriage, and the bounds of reproductive technology under Islamic law. In Indonesia, IVF is regulated by Article 111 of Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 as an implementing regulation of the Health Law. This study analyzes that provision through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah using the framework of the five objectives of Islamic law (al-ḍarūriyyāt al-khams). A normative legal research method was employed with textual and conceptual approaches, based on library research of relevant laws, fatwas ( MUI and Majma’ Fiqh al-Islāmī), and literature on fiqh and maqāṣid. The analysis maps each clause of Article 111 onto the five maqāṣid categories. The results indicate that normatively Article 111 embodies principles protecting all five objectives of Islamic law, with lineage protection being dominant. Restrictions limiting ART to legally married infertile couples, requiring the spouses’ own gametes, involvement of authorized medical professionals, and prohibitions of third-party donation, surrogacy, and non-medical sex selection reflect a maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah-oriented approach. Nevertheless, the regulation’s implementation is not yet fully maqāsidī, requiring further reinforcement. This study recommends enacting a specific law on assisted reproductive technology and more comprehensive regulation (including cross-border practices) to optimally safeguard all five objectives.

References

Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2022, Mei 23). Kemandulan (Infertil): Stigma Negatif Pada Wanita Indonesia. Retrieved from https://keslan.kemkes.go.id/view_artikel/12/kemandulan-infertil-stigma-negatif-pada- wanita-indonesia

Hendarto, H. (2019). Bayi Tabung: Teknologi, Etika, dan Tantangannya. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar, Universitas Airlangga.

Putra, R., Lillah, A., Razi, A., & Aziz, M. (2025). Infertilitas, Teknologi Reproduksi Berbantu, dan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan: Suatu Tinjauan Etika Kedokteran. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 9, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.26880/jeki.v9i1.87

Pulungan, S., & Musthofa, A. M. Z. (2021). Hukum Bayi Tabung dalam Pandangan Islam.

Al-Ikhtisar: The Renewal of Islamic Economic Law, 2(2), Article 2.

International Islamic Fiqh Academy. (2021). Resolutions and Recommendations of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy – Organization of Islamic Cooperation (Second Issue). International Islamic Fiqh Academy.

Mahmudah, N. (2023, Oktober 2). BAYI TABUNG/ INSEMINASI BUATAN. MUI Digital. Retrieved from https://mui.or.id/baca/fatwa/bayi-tabung-inseminasi-buatan

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Bidang Kesehatan. (2024). Retrieved from https://farmalkes.kemkes.go.id/unduh/pp-28-2024/

Sugian, A. (2024). Konsep Maslahah al-Juwaini dalam Kitab al-Burhan fi Ushul al-Fiqh pada Penyelesaian Kasus Bayi Tabung. Tasyri’: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53038/tsyr.v3i2.135

Dongoran, I. (2020). Bayi Tabung dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam (Analisis Maqāṣid al- Syarī‘ah). TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 2(1).

Adlina, S., & Dwiyanti, A. (2024). Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Utara Nomor 601/Pdt.G/2017/PA JU Mengenai Status Hukum Anak Yang Dilahirkan Melalui Proses Bayi Tabung Dengan Donor Sperma Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia Dan Hukum Islam. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan, 5(3), 218–232.

Kamali, M. H. (2019). Maqāshid al-Syāri’ah Made Simple. The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

Marzuki, P. M. (2025). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Kencana.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Honainah, H., Rato, D., & Susanti, D. O. (2023). Status Nasab dan Kewarisan Anak Hasil Sewa Rahim Perspektif Hukum Islam. Rechtenstudent, 4(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v4i1.225

Nugraha, M. R. (2025, Februari 3). Sahkah Donor Sperma di Indonesia? Klinik Hukumonline. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/sahkah-donor- sperma-di-indonesia-lt62aad2cc18f9d/

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Rohmah, C. N., & Setiyono, R. (2026). Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah’s Analysis of Assisted Reproduction Arrangements in Article 111 of Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024. Rechtsvinding, 4(2), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.2021

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.