The Application of the Principle of Balance Between the Parties in Standard Form Contracts under Civil Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1325Keywords:
Principle of Balance; Standard Form Contracts; Civil Law; Consumer Protection; Contract Law;Abstract
Standard form contracts are widely used in business activities due to their efficiency and practicality. However, their unilateral nature often places one party, particularly consumers, in a weaker bargaining position. This condition raises concerns regarding the application of the principle of balance between the parties as a fundamental principle in civil law. This study aims to analyze the application of the principle of balance in standard form contracts under civil law and to examine the extent to which existing legal regulations provide protection for the weaker party. This research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant legal principles, particularly those contained in the Civil Code and consumer protection laws. The results of the study indicate that although the principle of balance is recognized in civil law, its implementation in standard form contracts has not been fully realized, as many contractual clauses tend to favor business actors. Therefore, stronger legal safeguards and stricter supervision are required to ensure fairness and balance between the parties in standard form contracts.
References
Agustianto. (2022). An exoneration clause in standard agreements: Problems in consumer protection. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 17(1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.35401
Busro, A. (2019). Perlindungan hukum konsumen dalam perjanjian baku. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26(3), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art5
Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum kontrak: Dari sudut pandang hukum bisnis. Bandung, Indonesia: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum perjanjian: Asas proporsionalitas dalam kontrak komersial. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Hidayat, A. (2018). Kekuatan mengikat klausul eksonerasi dalam perjanjian baku dihubungkan dengan asas kebebasan berkontrak. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v16i2.5354
Kurniawan. (2020). Asas keseimbangan dalam kontrak baku sebagai perlindungan konsumen. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 9(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.424
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Prasetyo, A. J., Saidin, & Kamello, T. (2024). Consumer legal protection regarding standard clauses in electronic contracts of e-commerce transactions. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i2.3745
Setiawan, M. T., Busro, A., & Prasetyo, M. H. (2021). Asas keseimbangan sebagai indikator keadilan di dalam perjanjian baku. Notarius, 14(2), 905–915.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (1993). Kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan yang seimbang bagi para pihak dalam perjanjian kredit bank di Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Institut Bankir Indonesia.
Subekti. (2005). Hukum perjanjian. Jakarta, Indonesia: Intermasa.
Sutedi, A. (2018). Tanggung jawab produk dalam hukum perlindungan konsumen. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ghalia Indonesia.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2000). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Winarno, B., & Nugroho, H. S. (2022). Standard clauses and imbalance of bargaining power in consumer contracts. Hasanuddin Law Review, 8(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i1.3567
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suryaningsih, Vivi Sylvia Purborini, Kasmin, Rika Novitasari, Tikka Dessy Harsanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
