Reconstruction of Certainty and Efficiency-Based Execution of Guarantee Objects: A Legal Comparative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1849Keywords:
the execution of the object of the guarantee; the right of dependents; legal certainty; efficiency; legal comparisonAbstract
The execution of the object of collateral is a crucial phase in the material guarantee legal system because it determines the effectiveness of creditor protection and legal certainty in settling receivables. In Indonesian law, the Right of Dependency is designed as a guarantee instrument that gives preferential position and executory power to creditors. However, practice shows that the mechanism for the execution of the collateral object has not been fully implemented definitively and efficiently, and often even gives rise to further disputes. This study aims to analyze the structural problems of the execution of collateral objects in Indonesia and formulate a reconstruction of the execution mechanism based on legal certainty and efficiency through a comparative legal approach. This research uses normative legal research methods with legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative legal approaches. The results of the study show that the uncertainty of execution is caused by conflicts between legal regimes, ambiguity of execution norms, weak protection in execution auctions, and pre-execution problems related to the binding of guarantees. Through comparison with practices in other countries, this study found that the certainty and efficiency of execution can only be realized through coherent system design, post-execution dispute resolution, and harmonization between legal regimes. This research offers a reconstruction model of the execution of the collateral object that affirms the final character of the execution, strengthens the protection of parties in good faith, and integrates the principles of legal certainty and efficiency as a normative framework. This reconstruction is expected to be a reference for the renewal of the law on the execution of material guarantees in Indonesia
References
Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz, Kaleb Otniel Aritonang, Abyan Hafizd Naufal, and Affan Adyuanas. “Analisis Kasus Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Dalam Perkara Kredit Macet Dengan Menimbang Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan Media Hukum Indonesia ( MHI )” 4, no. 1 (2025): 112–19.
Arief Alfred Pranoto. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Bank Sebagai Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Pemberesan Aset Pailit (Studi Kasus Kepailitan PT. Cowell Development. Tbk)” 4, no. 12 (n.d.): 5577–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v4i12.7218.
Cristi, Echa, and Sepriyadi Adhan S. “Kepastian Hukum Pengikatan Jaminan Kredit Atas Objek Tanah Yang Belum Beralih Kepemilikan Kepada Debitor Dalam Praktik Perbankan Di Indonesia.” Al-Zayn-Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum 3, no. 3 (2025): 7855–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2493.
Fadhel, Moh, Abd Jalil, Muhamad Nabil Lamonsya, and Muhammad Alisra Chivalry. “Konflik Preferensi Negara Dan Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Kasus Sita Pajak Di KPKNL Surabaya” 4, no. 1 (2025): 767–86.
Felix Rovi, Lindartanto; Mohammad Ghufron Az; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani. “Kekuatan Hukum Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan Yang Terbit Atas Adanya Unsur Onbeschikking Bevoeg Pemberi Hak Tanggungan Atas Obyek Hak Tanggungan.” Merdeka Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v6i2.16373.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metodologi Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia, 2006.
Kotz, Konrad Zweigert; Hein. An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd Ed). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Lestari, Yunita Estu;Urbanisasi. “PENGAKUAN HKI SEBAGAI OBJEK HAK TANGGUNGAN : ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERLUASAN JAMINAN KEBENDAAN DALAM SISTEM.” Multilingual :Journal of Universal Studies 5, no. 2 (2025): 250–57.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
———. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Maskanah, Ummi, Agus Murianto, and Febry Nurtriandany Purnomo. “Perbandingan Praktik Lelang Eksekusi Dalam Perspektif Kenotariatan Antara Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat.” Jurnal Hukum Sasana 11, no. 2 (2025): 155–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4573.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum:Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.
Ngantung, Verra Yanti, and Trubus Rahardiansah. “Ketidakseimbangan Perlindungan Antara Kreditur Separatis (Pemegang Jaminan) Dan Prinsip Going Concern Debitor Dalam Proses PKPU Dan Kepailitan” 14, no. November (2025): 83–96.
Rahma, Luthfiah, Safitta Amanah, and Thyrafi Amelia Putri. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Implementasi Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Hak Tanggungan” 10, no. November (2025): 509–18. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4462.
Sabatini, Steffy;Muhammad Syukran Yamin Lubis; Ikhsan Lubis; Dody Safnul. “PERAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH DALAM PENDAFTARAN AKTA PEMBERIAN HAK TANGGUNGAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK (Studi Di Kantor PPAT Dr. H. Ikhsan Lubis, S.H., SPN., M.Kn).” Journal of Social and Economics Research 7, no. 2 (2025): 306–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v7i2.1052.
Sidharta, Bernard Arief. Refleksi Tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009.
Sirait, Rio Hernando, July Esther, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Hkbp, and Nommensen Medan. “Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Dalam Pelelangan Jaminan Bank Tidak Sesuai Prosedur” 15, no. 2 (2025): 246–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v15i2.13088.
Soerjono, Soekanto; Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2015.
Sulastri. “Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Pembeli Lelang Terhadap Pengosongan Objek Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2024. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/42464/1/Magister Kenotariatan_21302200205_fullpdf.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Basyarudin Basyarudin, Sahrul Hanafi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
