Political Reality in Indonesia from the Perspective of Vilfredo Pareto

Authors

  • Muhammad Sifa Fauzi Yulianis Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
  • Widia Ari Susanti Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1950

Keywords:

Wilfredo Pareto; Elite Circulation Theory; Indonesian Politics

Abstract

According to Wilfredo Pareto, a sociologist, history demonstrates a continuous circulation of elites. This circulation occurs through two processes: the movement of individuals from lower social strata to higher social strata, and the replacement of governing elites by previously non-governing elites. When an elite group enters a position of political power, another elite group must leave that position. However, social theories such as Pareto’s elite circulation theory often encounter contradictions when confronted with empirical realities. The same situation occurs with Wilfredo Pareto’s theory of elite circulation when it is examined within the context of political reality in Indonesia. Empirical evidence indicates that political parties in Indonesia have not experienced effective elite circulation; instead, they tend to demonstrate practices of dynastic politics. This phenomenon can be observed during general elections and regional elections, where political candidates often consist of the same individuals or groups repeatedly. This study aims to examine Wilfredo Pareto’s elite circulation theory, analyze criticisms from other sociologists regarding Pareto’s theoretical perspective, and investigate how Pareto’s theory applies within Indonesian society. This research employs a library research method, namely research conducted by collecting relevant literature regarding Wilfredo Pareto’s elite circulation theory and subsequently describing and analyzing the collected data. The results indicate that, according to Pareto, political and governmental systems should experience changes, rotation, and movement among elites. Nevertheless, when applied to the Indonesian political context, Pareto’s theory appears to contradict reality. Indonesia demonstrates characteristics of dynastic politics, where individuals who are able to access political leadership and governmental positions are frequently those who possess close relationships with political party leaders. Consequently, political candidates in democratic processes such as elections and regional elections tend to remain unchanged, resulting in limited elite circulation.

References

Anshoriy, Nasruddin. Bangsa Gagal Mencari Identitas Kebangsaan. Yoyakarta: LKiS, 2008.

Garna, Judistira K. Terori-Teori Perubahan Sosial. Bandung : Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pajajaran, 1992.

Varma, S.P. Teori Politik Modern. Jakarta : Rajawali Press, 1987.

Harold Birch, Anthony. Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. Cetakan Kedua. London: Routledge, 2001.

Higley, John. Continuities and Discontinuities in Elite Theory. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018.

Best, Heinrich and John Higley. The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018.

Pakulski, Jan. Classical Elite Theory: Pareto and Weber. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018.

Best, Heinrich, and John Higley. 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Birch, Anthony Harold. 2001. Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. London: Routledge.

Crouch, Harold. 1979. The Army and Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Dalton, Russell J. 2018. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hadiz, Vedi R., and Richard Robison. 2013. The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia. In The Political Economy of Southeast Asia.

Higley, John. 2018. Continuities and Discontinuities in Elite Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kahin, George McTurnan. 1952. Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. Party Politics 1(1): 5-28.

Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing.

Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.

Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pakulski, Jan. 2018. Classical Elite Theory: Pareto and Weber. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pareto, Vilfredo. 1935. The Mind and Society: A Treatise on General Sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge.

Slater, Dan. 2018. The Party Cartel and Indonesian Democracy. Contemporary Southeast Asia 40(3): 409-430.

Suryadinata, Leo. 2015. Indonesia's Political Parties and Democracy. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Aspinall, Edward. 2013. Popular Agency and Interests in Indonesia's Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Indonesia 96: 101-121.

Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. 2019. Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Carothers, Thomas. 2002. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13(1): 5-21.

Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Yulianis, M. S. F., & Susanti, W. A. (2026). Political Reality in Indonesia from the Perspective of Vilfredo Pareto. Rechtsvinding, 4(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1950

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.