LLM-Driven Cognitive Digital Twins in Education: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework

Authors

  • Fadliyani Nawir Institut Bisnis dan Keuangan Nitro, Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.2039

Keywords:

large language models; cognitive digital twin; learner modeling; trustworthy AI; retrieval-augmented generation

Abstract

Within educational technology, the adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI (GenAI) has accelerated notably, yielding applications spanning intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive assessment pipelines, and automated formative feedback. Yet the fusion of these generative capabilities with Cognitive Digital Twin (CDT) architectures has proceeded unevenly, leaving theoretical and practical gaps unaddressed. This study reports a systematic literature review conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 principles. After screening 1,400 records from ScienceDirect and IEEE Xplore, 111 Core and Supporting studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. A narrative thematic synthesis was then carried out by mapping the included studies to five research questions and five thematic clusters. The five thematic clusters comprise CDT and learner modeling, LLM and GenAI tutoring, adaptive assessment and feedback, ethics and explainability, and learning analytics. The analysis reveals that automated feedback and assessment constitute the most densely evidenced application domains, whereas learner modeling and CDT remain underdeveloped as sustained personalization mechanisms. The paper’s primary contribution is a five-layer LLM-driven CDT framework comprising a Learner Data Layer, a Learner Digital Twin Layer, an LLM Intelligence Layer, an Adaptive Learning Service Layer, and a cross-cutting Trust, Ethics, and Governance Layer. Taken together, these layers constitute a learner-aware, adaptive, explainable, and human-centered architecture intended to ground and direct future empirical inquiry.

References

Aboulsafa, E. I., El Khayat, G. A., & Elmorsy, S. A. (2023). An educational human digital twin proposed model for personalized e-learning. In *2023 IEEE Afro-Mediterranean Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AMCAI)* (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1109/AMCAI59331.2023.10431503

Abu-Rasheed, H., Jumbo, C., Al Amin, R., Weber, C., Wiese, V., Obermaisser, R., & Fathi, M. (2025). LLM-assisted knowledge graph completion for curriculum and domain modelling in personalized higher education recommendations. In *2025 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)* (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON62633.2025.11016377

Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. *Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6*, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33*.

Cagliero, L., Farinetti, L., Fior, J., & Manenti, A. I. (2024). ChatGPT, be my teaching assistant! Automatic correction of SQL exercises. In *2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)* (pp. 81–87).

Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. *User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4*(4), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821

Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Almutairy, S., et al. (2024). Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study. *Heliyon, 10*(8), e29317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317

Du, H., Rashid, P., Jia, Q., & Gehringer, E. (2024). Interactive rubric generator for instructor’s assessment using prompt engineering and large language models. In *2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)* (pp. 1–9).

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). *Official Journal of the European Union*. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng

Frank, L., Herth, F., Stuwe, P., Klaiber, M., Gerschner, F., & Theissler, A. (2024). Leveraging GenAI for an intelligent tutoring system for R: A quantitative evaluation of large language models. In *2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)* (pp. 1–9).

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. *TechTrends, 59*(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

Gopi, S., Sreekanth, D., & Dehbozorgi, N. (2024). Enhancing engineering education through LLM-driven adaptive quiz generation: A RAG-based approach. In *2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)* (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893146

Hadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Kim, J. J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y. D., Metwally, A. H. S., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., Nacke, L. E., & Gao, H. (2024). ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions. *Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2*(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027

Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y., Chen, D., Dai, W., Chan, H. S., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. *ACM Computing Surveys, 55*(12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730

Jürgensmeier, L., & Skiera, B. (2024). Generative AI for scalable feedback to multimodal exercises. *International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41*(3), 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.05.005

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. *Learning and Individual Differences, 103*, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in education. *Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3*, 100074.

Kinsner, W. (2021). Digital twins for personalized education and lifelong learning. In *2021 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)* (pp. 1–6).

Kitchenham, B. (2007). *Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering* (Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report).

Lin, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2024). The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback. *System, 127*.

Lui, R. W. C., Bai, H., Zhang, A. W. Y., & Chu, E. T. H. (2024). GPTutor: A generative AI-powered intelligent tutoring system to support interactive learning with knowledge-grounded question answering. In *2024 International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA)* (pp. 702–707).

Madhubhashana, S., Ranhinda, V., Jayakody, D., Shavinda, L., Nawarathne, M., & Haddela, P. (2024). Adapting pedagogical frameworks to online learning: Simulating the tutor role with LLMs and the QUILT model. In *2024 6th International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC)* (pp. 581–586).

Makharia, R., Kim, Y. C., Jo, S. B., Kim, M. A., Jain, A., Agarwal, P., et al. (2024). AI tutor enhanced with prompt engineering and deep knowledge tracing. In *2024 IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI)* (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/IATMSI60426.2024.10503187

Ouyang, F., Guo, M., Zhang, N., Bai, X., & Jiao, P. (2024). Comparing the effects of instructor manual feedback and ChatGPT intelligent feedback on collaborative programming in China’s higher education. *IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17*, 2227–2239. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3486749

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. *BMJ, 372*, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Prasetyo, M. M., & Muslaini, F. (2025). Utilization of digital twin technology in education ecosystem: A systematic literature review. *4*(2), 13–26.

Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. *Healthcare, 11*(6).

Sinha, A., Goyal, S., Sy, Z., Kuperus, R., Dickey, E., & Bejarano, A. (2024). BoilerTAI: A platform for enhancing instruction using generative AI in educational forums. In *2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)* (pp. 1–8).

Susnjak, T. (2024). Beyond predictive learning analytics modelling and onto explainable artificial intelligence with prescriptive analytics and ChatGPT. *International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34*(2), 452–482.

Vargas-Murillo, A. R., Pari-Bedoya, I. N. M. D. L. A., & Guevara-Soto, F. D. J. (2023). The ethics of AI assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impacts of ChatGPT usage in education. *ACM International Conference Proceedings Series, 22*(7), 8–13.

Yamin, M. M., Imran, A. S., & Katt, B. (2023). Towards a digital twin for lifelong learning. In *2023 4th International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET)* (pp. 1–6).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Nawir, F. (2026). LLM-Driven Cognitive Digital Twins in Education: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework. Global Education Journal, 4(1), 691–706. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.2039

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.