Intangible Asset Management in the Perspective of Higher Education Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/jess.1411Keywords:
intangible asset management, intellectual capital, higher education management, institutional performanceAbstract
Intangible assets have become strategic resources in higher education institutions, particularly in strengthening institutional performance, competitiveness, and sustainability. This study aims to examine the concept and role of intangible asset management in the perspective of higher education management through a comprehensive literature-based analysis. Using a qualitative approach with a library research design, this study analyzes scholarly articles, academic books, and reputable publications related to intangible assets, intellectual capital, and higher education management. Data were collected from open-access and indexed academic databases and analyzed using content analysis techniques to identify key themes and conceptual patterns. The findings indicate that intangible assets in higher education consist of human capital, structural capital, and relational capital, which interact synergistically in creating institutional value. Human capital plays a crucial role in enhancing academic quality and innovation, structural capital ensures the institutionalization of knowledge through governance systems and policies, while relational capital strengthens reputation and stakeholder trust. The study concludes that effective management of intangible assets requires an integrative and strategic approach rather than a fragmented administrative practice. This research contributes conceptually by offering a holistic framework for managing intangible assets in higher education and provides practical insights for university leaders in developing sustainable institutional strategies.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76.
https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. URL: https://us.sagepub.com
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. URL: https://us.sagepub.com
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. URL: https://us.sagepub.com
Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. URL: https://uk.sagepub.com
Secundo, G., Pérez, S. E., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. H. (2017). An intellectual capital framework to measure universities’ third mission activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. URL: https://www.bkconnection.com
Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: An introduction and perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 6–14.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279710800682
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. URL: https://obor.or.id
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asnawi Asnawi, Viati Nurhidayati, Agus Dwi Cahyono, A. Fadoli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
