Crypto-Geological Fiqh Law: Analysis of Maqashid Syariah on the Use of Blockchain and Smart Contract in the Distribution of Cross-Country Natural Disaster Compensation Funds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1766Keywords:
Maqashid Syariah; Blockchain; Smart Contract; Philanthropy Disasters; Crypto- Geological JurisprudenceAbstract
Increasing frequency disaster natural cross- country demands system fast, transparent and accountable distribution of compensation funds, but system conventional Still face constraint bureaucracy layered, chain intermediation long, and fragmentation regulations between countries that hinder effectiveness help humanity. Blockchain technology and smart contracts are here as solution potential, but its use in Islamic philanthropy requires justification from perspective maqashid sharia so as not to cause harm new. Research This is studies literature that analyzes use of blockchain and smart contracts in distribution of compensation funds disaster natural across countries through framework Maqashid Syariah. Research results disclose that blockchain architecture provides benefit significant in the form of transparency and accountability that contribute to protection property, as well as efficiency supporting distribution protection soul, even though keep potential understanding such as pseudo- anonymous, consumption energy excessive, and disparity digital infrastructure. Smart contract scheme aligned with principle clarity contract and prevent gharar, however its rigidity contradictory with principle emergency and have vulnerability in the oracle problem. Dimension cross- country causes tension between sovereignty laws and regulations give help humanity, which requires framework law transnational adaptive. Synthesis study produce framework Islamic ethics for blockchain governance based on trust, maslahah, shura, hisbah, and balance transparency-privacy. Implementation results study realized in prototype consortium blockchain system with governance participatory, emergency override mechanism, decentralized oracle, privacy differential, as well as an independent sharia supervisory board.
References
Al-Khamlichi, F., Amal, J., & Para Peneliti Konferensi. (2021). Provisions of international humanitarian law in Islam. Al-Maaref Al-Jadida Printing House.
Ayub, M. (2026). Islamic finance as an ethical and responsible finance: Exploring a new paradigm of shared growth, welfare, and sustainability. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Azmi, U., Rosadi, K. I., & Zebua, A. M. (2022). The urgency of Ihsan and thinking systemic in increasing motivation and quality of education. Jurnal Ilmiah Teunuleh, 3(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.51612/teunuleh.v3i2.88
Billah, M. M. (2022). Halal cryptocurrency management. Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fortune Indonesia. (2026, March 8). Fatwa Muhammadiyah: Kripto mubah untuk investasi, bukan mata uang. Fortune Indonesia. https://www.fortuneidn.com/sharia/fatwa-muhammadiyah-kripto-mubah-untuk-investasi-bukan-mata-uang-00-4vfn9-v2yc0h
Hukumonline. (2026, March 18). Status hukum aset kripto dalam Islam, bisakah jadi harta waris? Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/status-hukum-aset-kripto-dalam-islam--bisakah-jadi-harta-waris-lt69bb635d83b32/?page=all
Kompasiana. (2025, June 16). Zakat blockchain dalam kerangka maslahah performa. Kompasiana.com. https://www.kompasiana.com/elislampurnamaalam4000/684f1819ed64157055443fe2/zakat-blockchain-dalam-kerangka-maslahah-performa
Muhammadiyah.or.id. (2026, March 2). Pendekatan fikih muamalah menjadi kerangka menilai keabsahan transaksi aset kripto. Muhammadiyah.or.id. https://muhammadiyah.or.id/2026/03/pendekatan-fikih-muamalah-menjadi-kerangka-menilai-keabsahan-transaksi-aset-kripto/
Nipa, N. N., Zahid, Z., Amin, M. R., Alamm, M. S., Haque, Z. M. E., & Parves, M. M. (2026). Harnessing Islamic FinTech for disaster risk financing: Innovative strategies for economic resilience and sustainable development. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 12(1), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art9
Othman, K., Wahab, M. Z. H., & Saufi, M. S. A. M. (2025). Digital frontiers in Islamic finance advancing SDGs through Maqasid and Maslahah. In Digital frontiers in Islamic finance. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5653-1.ch001
Pettalongi, S. S., Muas, M., Arafat, A., & Ndaomanu, D. N. (2025). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan campuran: Teori dan praktik. Media Penerbit Indonesia.
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara.
Rofiq, M. A., Fathoni, J., & Barnamij, N. (2025). Optimizing zakat and waqf through digital innovation in the framework of Maqashid Syariah: A solution for poverty alleviation in Indonesia. Dialektika: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v10i2.6939
Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Santosa, P. I. (2021). Metodologi penelitian (Edisi 1). Universitas Terbuka.
Wajdi, F., & Susanti, D. (2026). Hukum Bisnis Islam: Kompas etis di era digital. Pustaka Kita.
Yin, R. K. (2022). Qualitative research from start to finish (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Zed, M. (2021). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (Edisi 3). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azhari Azhari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




