Reconstruction of Electronic Deed Regulations Based on Legal Certainty and Justice in the Indonesian Notary System

Authors

  • Marsella Marsella Universitas Medan Area
  • Rafiqi Rafiqi Universitas Medan Area

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1914

Keywords:

Electronic Deed; Legal Certainty;, Notary

Abstract

The transformation of information technology has driven the digitalization of notarial services, including the growing use of electronic deeds in various legal transactions. However, the regulation of electronic deeds in Indonesia still raises legal certainty issues due to the lack of integration of provisions in the Notary Law with the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This study aims to examine the regulation of electronic deeds, assess their evidentiary strength, and formulate a regulatory reconstruction model based on legal certainty and justice. The study uses normative legal methods with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach, through a qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of electronic deeds is still scattered and does not clearly regulate the form, procedures for making, and the status of evidence. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, explicit recognition of electronic deeds as authentic deeds under certain conditions, implementation of digital security standards, and affirmation of notary responsibilities are needed to create legal protection and justice for the parties.

References

Arief, BN (2010). Anthology of Criminal Law Policy. Jakarta: Kencana.

Atmadja, IG (2020). Legal certainty in electronic document evidence in Indonesia. Journal of Modern Law, 6(2), 101–116.

Friedman, L. M. (2001). American Law: An Introduction. New York: W.W. Norton.

Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.

Hadjon, PM (1987). Legal Protection for the Indonesian People. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Hiariej, EOS (2012). Theory and Law of Evidence. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kelsen, H. (1961). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell & Russell.

Kusuma, RA (2021). The evidentiary power of authentic deeds from a civil law perspective. Jurnal Yustisia Indonesia, 8(1), 55–70.

Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.

Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Lestari, PD (2022). The position of written evidence in the Indonesian civil evidence system. National Legality Journal, 10(3), 211–226.

Marzuki, F. (2023). Authentication and integrity of electronic documents as legal evidence. Journal of Technology and Law, 5(1), 34–49.

Nugroho, T. (2024). Application of the best evidence rule to electronic documents in civil evidence. Journal of Contemporary Law, 7(1), 77–92.

Pratama, A. (2023). The position of electronic deeds in the Indonesian civil law evidence system. Journal of Digital Law and Justice, 4(1), 45–60.

Putri, SA (2021). Notary responsibilities in the use of certified electronic signatures. Jurnal Kenotariatan Nusantara, 3(2), 87–102.

Radbruch, G. (1973). Legal Philosophy. New York: Greenwood Press.

Rafiqi, R., & Marsella, M. (2020). Legal satisfaction of electronic authentic diction made notary in facing Industrial Revolution 4.0. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1).

Rafiqi, R., & Marsella, M. (2020). Legal satisfaction of electronic authentic diction made notary in facing Industrial Revolution 4.0. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1).

Rafiqi, R., Kartika, A., & Marsella, M. (2021). Property rights theory reviewed from the perspective of Malay customary land rights. Mercatoria Journal, 14(2), 71–76.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Progressive Law: A Synthesis of Indonesian Law. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Rahmawati, D. (2022). Harmonization of notary law and electronic transactions in Indonesia. Journal of Legislation and Legal Reform, 7(1), 66–81.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Santoso, B. (2021). The validity of electronic deeds from the perspective of Indonesian civil law. National Jurisprudence Journal, 9(3), 201–218.

Saputra, H. (2022). The validity of electronic deeds in Indonesian notarial practice. Journal of Notary and Regulation, 4(2), 123–139.

Sembiring, M. (2023). Justice and legal protection in the use of electronic deeds. Journal of Legal Reform, 9(2), 145–160.

Subekti. (2005). Law of Evidence. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

UNCITRAL. (1996). Model Law on Electronic Commerce. Vienna: United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Marsella, M., & Rafiqi, R. (2026). Reconstruction of Electronic Deed Regulations Based on Legal Certainty and Justice in the Indonesian Notary System. Rechtsvinding, 4(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.1914

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.