Juridical Analysis of the Annulment of the Execution of Arbitral Awards by the District Court in the Supreme Court Decision

Authors

  • Moses Sampe Karaeng Arung Labi Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i2.994

Keywords:

Arbitration Annulment, Award Enforcement, Article 70 Law No. 30/1999, District Court Authority, Judicial Consistency

Abstract

Arbitral awards in Indonesia are final and binding under Article 60 of Law No. 30/1999, yet District Courts (DCs) frequently annul enforcement through Article 70, creating legal uncertainty. This article examines annulment patterns in the Jakarta, Bekasi, and Tangerang DCs, alongside the Supreme Court’s (SC) role in safeguarding arbitral finality. Employing a doctrinal legal method through case analysis of four SC rulings (2021–2024) and comparative review of DC reasoning, the study identifies three dominant grounds: Jakarta DC broadly invoked public policy violations (60% of cases), Bekasi DC emphasized procedural defects (75%), while Tangerang DC referred to public interest conflicts. However, the SC overturned 85% of these rulings, reaffirming that (1) Article 70 applies only to concrete procedural or public policy breaches, (2) DCs lack authority to reassess the merits of arbitral awards, and (3) non-material defects cannot justify annulment. These findings reveal inconsistent DC interpretations, particularly the expansive notion of public policy adopted by Jakarta DC, which contrasts with the SC’s narrow, procedure-focused approach. Such disparities undermine arbitral finality and discourage foreign investment. The SC thus plays a pivotal role as a legal filter, though systemic reforms remain necessary through specialized judicial training, jurisprudential harmonization, and legislative revision of Indonesia’s Arbitration Law.

References

Analisis Yuridis oleh E. M. Angel, G. L. Tobing, dan W. S. Widiarty (2021). Hlm. 59–62 Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 53 No. 2, 2024, hlm. 191–202.

Artikel Hukumonline, “Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase dan Pembatalan oleh Pengadilan Negeri,” 2023 Kontan.co.id, “ESDM Banding atas Putusan PTUN yang Menangkan Asmin Koalindo Tuhup,” 18 April 2018.

Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003, Githa Bianti, “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional yang BerpotensiMenghambat Kegiatan Investasi Asing di Indonesia,” Crepido, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2023, hlm. 64-78.

bitrase.html https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html/?q=%22Pembatalan+putusan%22 Sumber: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/eksekusi-putusan-arbitrase-lt6724ece040be3/ .

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, “Pembatalan Arbitrase,” 18 November2021, https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html/?q=%22Pembatalan+a rbitrase%22.

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, “Pembatalan Arbitrase,” 18 November 2021.

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, “Pembatalan Arbitrase,” 18 November 2021

https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/index/pengadilan/mahkamahagung/kategori/ar

https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaef2799aa3891989af530393234303 1html; Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi Nomor 531/Pdt.Sus-Arb/2023/PN Bk https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/download/1441/340/1747

Husni Kurniawati dan Salma Nur Hanifah, “Inkonsistensi Penerapan Pasal 70 UU ADR dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia,” University of Bengkulu Law Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, Oktober 2024, Jurnal Konstitusi, "Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase," diakses pada 19 Mei 2025.

Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 53 No. 2, 2024

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 3 Tahun 2023 (PERMA No. 3/2023.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 199 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2023.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 918 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2023 tanggal 24 Agustus 2023 antara PT Berkah Tiga Usaha vs PT Berkah Kawasan Manyar Sejahtera Putusan PN Tangerang No. 1188/Pdt.P/2022/PN.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014, hlm. 43-44.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi Nomor 531/Pdt.Sus-Arb/2023/PN Bks.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan Negeri.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Internet IAIN Kudus Repository, BAB III Metode Penelitian, hlm.35, http://repository.iainkudus.ac.id/6147/6/6.%20BAB%20III.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles