A Legal Analysis of Liability-Exemption Clauses Used by Parking Operators for Consumer Vehicle Losses under Article 18(1)(a) of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.2156Keywords:
Consumer Protection, Parking Operator Liability, Standard-Form ContractAbstract
Parking services are commonly provided through standard-form agreements, including parking tickets that may contain clauses excluding the operator’s liability for vehicle loss. Such clauses raise legal concerns regarding the balance between contractual freedom and consumer protection, particularly when consumers are required to accept predetermined terms to access a service. This study examines the legal validity of liability-exemption clauses used by parking operators in cases of consumer vehicle loss and evaluates the application of Article 18(1)(a) of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of relevant legislation and judicial decisions, while secondary materials include scholarly publications and legal literature concerning standard-form contracts and business liability. The analysis indicates that Article 18(1)(a) prohibits standard-form clauses that transfer or exclude business actors’ responsibility, while Article 18(3) establishes that clauses violating the statutory prohibitions are null and void by operation of law. Accordingly, the mere inclusion of a liability-exemption statement on a parking ticket cannot automatically release a parking operator from legal responsibility. Nevertheless, the determination of liability in an individual dispute requires an assessment of the applicable legal provisions, the operator’s conduct, the circumstances of the loss, and the relevant judicial reasoning. This study concludes that consumer protection in parking services depends not only on the existence of statutory prohibitions but also on their consistent application in resolving disputes. A careful legal assessment is therefore necessary to distinguish prohibited contractual exclusions from liability issues that must be determined according to the facts and applicable law.
References
Agustianto, A. (2022). An Exoneration Clause in Standard Agreements: Problems in Consumer Protection. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.35401
Azzahra, S. A., & Apriani, R. (2024). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Jasa Parkir Atas Kehilangan Barang Pribadi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 423/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt. Pst). Jurnal UDA, 32(5).
Chakraborty, A., Shankar, R., & Marsden, J. R. (2022). An empirical analysis of consumer-unfriendly E-commerce terms of service agreements: Implications for customer satisfaction and business survival. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101151
Cumyn, M. (2025). Standard Form Contracts and the Erosion of Consent: Is There No Turning Back?†. American Journal of Comparative Law, 73(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avaf016
Dewa Kadek Kevin Patria, & Abdul Rokhim. (2025). Klausula Eksonerasi dalam E-Commerce: Antara Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12776
Gerungan, S. W. J., Wahongan, A., & Lembong, R. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kendaraan Konsumen. E-Journal Unsrat, 3(2).
Hambali, F., & Harliyanto, R. (2026). The Validity of Standard Clauses on Parking Tickets in the Perspective of Consumer Protection. Journal of Social Science, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v7i4.1079
Hartono, R., Nababan, T., Silalahi, A. P., & Siagian, Y. P. P. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Kerusakan dan Kehilangan dalam Kawasan Parkir. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.971
Hikmawati, & Hasdar. (2025). Dilema Yuridis Klausula Eksonerasi: Antara Kepastian Hukum Pengelola Parkir Dan Keadilan Bagi Konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Cassowary, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.65675/jhc.v2i2.197
Mahayani, S., Zuhairi, A., & Saleh, Moh. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Barang Yang Cacat Setelah Melakukan Transaksi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Commerce Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/commercelaw.v2i1.1364
Ningrat, N. N. T., & Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2025). Legal Liability of Bhukti Praja Sewakadarma Regional Housing for Vehicle Loss. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v5i9.3510
Noviyanto, D. E., Sri Widiarty, W., & Panjaitan, H. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pengelola Jasa Parkir Ditinjau dari Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Action Research Literate, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v8i6.425
Okhtiara, F., & Joesoef, I. E. (2025). Liability of Parking Management for Consumer Vehicles Loss in Parking Facilities: (A Case Study of the Supreme Court of Indonesia Decision No. 2078K/Pdt/2009). AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 7(2).
Pałka, P., Pałosz, R., Porębski, A., & Wiśniewska, K. (2024). A dataset on the contents of 100 terms of service of online platforms, analyzed and evaluated under the EU consumer law. Data in Brief, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110136
Pałka, P., Porębski, A., Pałosz, R., & Wiśniewska, K. (2025). Do Foreign Service Providers Simply Ignore the EU Consumer Law? An Empirical Study of 100 Online Terms of Service. Journal of Consumer Policy, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09580-z
Pradnyandari, I. A. A., Mahendrawati, N. L. M., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2024). Perlindungan Konsumen Pengguna Jasa Parkir Atas Pelepasan Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Parkir Menerapkan Klausula Baku dalam Mencapai Keadilan Berkontrak. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.5.2.8079.183-190
Rahayu, D., Badruddin, A., & Wang, E. (2026). Void by Law, Alive in Practice: Measuring Prohibited Standard Clauses in Twenty Indonesian Digital-Platform Contracts under Article 18. Enigma in Law, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v3i2.126
Rahmad Tullah, Purwanto Purwanto, & Setiyo Utomo. (2025). Batasan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pengelola Jasa Parkir. Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata Dan Pidana, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v2i3.1135
Rasyid, F., & Apriani, R. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Perjanjian Baku yang mengadung klasula Eksonerasi Terhadap Usaha Pengelola Parkir. JUSTITIA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v7i2.456-466
Rieländer, F. (2025). Policing Consumer Contract Terms under US and EU Law: A Comparative Analysis of the Directive 93/13/EEC on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts and the Restatement of Consumer Contracts. German Law Journal, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2025.10138
Sumitro, S. S., Maramis, R. A., & Bawole, H. Y. A. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Kendaraan Bermotor Konsumen Di Area Parkir Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, 13(1).
Utama, E. S. K., Tjoanda, M., & Kuahaty, S. S. (2025). Legal Protection for Parking Service Users to Standard Agreements Containing Exclusion Clauses. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i3.2234
Wis̀niewska, K., & Pałka, P. (2023). The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service. Yearbook of European Law, 42. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saras Wati, Rasyid Al-Faruq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
