Application of Ethical Sanctions for Abuse of Influence by Members of The Corruption Eradication Commission

Authors

  • M Haidar Hanif Gengki Zulfikar Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Hartoyo Hartoyo Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Sri Astutik Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i2.993

Keywords:

Ethical Sanctions, Corruption Eradication Commission, Law Enforcement

Abstract

The establishment of the Republic of Indonesia as a State of Law requires that all actions must be based on the Law, this is also done in the Corruption Law Enforcement institution which is regulated in Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, although in its journey there are violations such as those committed by the deputy chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission, namely brother NG, who has been sanctioned by the KPK Supervisory Board with moderate sanctions as stipulated in the Regulation of the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2021 concerning Enforcement of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of the Corruption Eradication Commission, but this does not reflect justice considering NG's position as KPK Leader. In this case, the problem formulation is used, namely 1) How is the application of ethical sanctions against abuse of influence by members of the Corruption Eradication Commission? 2) Can Ethical Sanctions be Used as a Foundation in Law Enforcement of Corruption Crimes? By using the Normative Juridical research method and 2 (two) Approach Methods, namely the statute approach, conceptual approach, several conclusions were drawn that the sanctions imposed on Ng as KPK Leader did not reflect justice and fulfill the theory of punishment, namely the deterrent effect, where NG should have been imposed with severe sanctions considering his position as KPK Leader

References

Ali, M. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Barnawi, & Arifin, M. (2012). Kinerja Guru Profesional. Yogyakarta: Arruz-Media.

Budaiwi, A. A. (2002). Imbalan dan Hukuman Pengaruhnya Bagi Pendidikan Anak. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Gunardi Endro. (2017). Menyelisik Makna Integritas dan Pertentangannya. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1), 131–152. Retrieved from https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/Dokumen/Jurnal-INTEGRITAS-Volume-3-No-1-tahun-2017/Jurnal-INTEGRITAS-Volume-3-No-1-tahun-2017-06.pdf

H, W. R., Putra, M. F. F., Hellenia, S., Rizaldi, R., & Weliyansyah, G. (2024). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI APBD YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KEPALA DAERAH DI LAMPUNG TENGAH. Journal of Law and Nation (JOLN), 3(2), 404–411. Retrieved from https://joln.org/index.php/joln/article/view/127/138

I Made Pasek Diantha. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Korupsi, K. P. (2006). Memahami Untuk Membasmi: Buku Saku Untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta.

Kurniawan, M. (2016). Penggelapan Uang Dan Surat Berharga Oleh Pegawai Negeri Sebagai Tindak Pidana Khusus Dalam Pasal 8 Undangundang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, V(5), 84–92. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/13295/12879

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum (Pertama). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Pawennei, M., & Tomalili, R. (2015). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Pitriyah, & Apriani, R. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(3), 1189–1195. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i3.1189-1195

Saimima, I. D. S. (2020). Rekonstruksi Pidana Restitusi dan Pidana Kurungan Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher.

Sari, H. P., & Santosa, B. (2024). Nurul Ghufron Terbukti Salah Gunakan Pengaruh untuk mutasi, Kena Sanksi Etik. Retrieved September 21, 2024, from Kompas.Com website: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/09/06/16071891/nurul-ghufron-terbukti-salah-gunakan-pengaruh-untuk-mutasi-kena-sanksi-etik

Teguh Prasetyo, & Barkatullah, A. H. (2007). Ilmu Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta: PUSTAKA PELAJAR.

Tim Penyusun Modul Badan Diklat Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Modul Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta.

Triandani, S. (2014). Pengaruh Tim Kerja, Stress Kerja dan Reward (Imbalan). Pekanbaru: LPPM.

Wiarti, J. (2023). Efektifitas Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. UIR Law Review, 7(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2023.vol7(2).15681

Yuntho, E., Deta, I., Limbong, J., Bakar, R., & Ilyas, F. (2014). Hasil Penelitian Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi. In Indonesia Corruption Watch. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://aclc.kpk.go.id/materi-pembelajaran/hukum/buku/penerapan-unsur-merugikan-keuangan-negara-dalam-delik-tindak-pidana-korupsi

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles