Realitas Akademik Vs idealitas Teori: Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMA Ibrahimy 2 Sukorejo

Authors

  • Nikmatul Wafiroh Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Haifa ratna wiyanti Haifa Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Fharadhiesty Abdianty Putri Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Fatehatul Hasinah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1892

Keywords:

Learning Evaluation, PAI, Formative-Summative, Pesantren School.

Abstract

This study aims to describe and analyze the implementation of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning evaluation at SMA Ibrahimy 2 Sukorejo, Situbondo. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were gathered through observations, interviews, and documentation. The findings indicate that the school has shifted its evaluation paradigm from traditional categorization (cognitive, affective, psychomotor) towards Formative and Summative Assessments. While differentiated evaluation is successfully implemented such as introducing High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) for advanced classes challenges like overcrowded classrooms (up to 70 students) and limited technological facilities force teachers to compromise on practical efficiency, such as omitting oral tests. Viewed through an Islamic perspective, these practical adaptations align with the jurisprudence principle of "Al-Masyaqqah Tajlibut-Taysir" (hardship brings ease) and incorporate Islamic core values like Shiddiq, Amanah, and Muhasabah

References

Andrianto, D. (2018). Manajemen Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama Islam (Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi). Dewantara V.

Dhomiri, A., & Nursikin, M. (2023). Evaluasi Afektif Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(1).

Diana Devi, A., & Andrean, S. (2021). KONSEP EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN ISLAM PERSPEKTIF AL-QUR’AN BESERTA IMPLIKASINYA. 4(1). Retrieved from https://al-afkar.com/index.php/Afkar_Journal/issue/view/4https://al-fkar.com/index.php/Afkar_Journal/issue/view/4

DP, U. (2020). PENERAPAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP EVALUASI DALAM MATA PELAJARANPENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM (PAI). CENDEKIA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN, 8(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v8i2.176

Irwan Soulisa, Moh. Supratman, Okta Rosfiani, & Reno Renaldi. (2022). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Evi damayanti, Ed.). Bandung: Penerbit Widina Bhakti Persada.

Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Lexy J. Moleong. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif,. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya.

Marlina, Irfiana, Y., & Hilaliati, N. (2024). The Importance of Learning Evaluation in Subjects Islamic Religious Education (PAI) in Schools. Geneologi PAI Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment. Designing Assessments To Inform and Improve Student Performance. ERIC.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19

How to Cite

Nikmatul Wafiroh, Haifa, H. ratna wiyanti, Fharadhiesty Abdianty Putri, & Fatehatul Hasinah. (2026). Realitas Akademik Vs idealitas Teori: Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMA Ibrahimy 2 Sukorejo. Global Education Journal, 4(2), 1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1892

Similar Articles

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.