Artificial Intelligence, Digital Civic Education, and Their Implications for Democratic Quality in Indonesia

Authors

  • Fitra Hadi Khaz Lancang Kuning College of Administrative Sciences (STIA) Dumai, Indonesia
  • Amanda Meylani Dewi Lancang Kuning College of Administrative Sciences (STIA) Dumai, Indonesia
  • Dhea Cantika Lancang Kuning College of Administrative Sciences (STIA) Dumai, Indonesia
  • Bella Desvita Lancang Kuning College of Administrative Sciences (STIA) Dumai, Indonesia
  • Hanna Zavira Nazla Lancang Kuning College of Administrative Sciences (STIA) Dumai, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i3.1255

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Digital Civic Education, Political Campaigns

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed various aspects of public life, including political processes and civic engagement in Indonesia. Within the educational context, AI-driven political information circulating through digital platforms has become an informal learning environment that shapes citizens’ democratic understanding and political behavior. This study aims to analyze the use of artificial intelligence in the Indonesian political system and examine its implications for democratic literacy and civic learning. Employing a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design, this research conducts a desk review and normative analysis of academic literature, policy documents, and relevant regulations related to AI, digital governance, and civic education. The findings indicate that AI technologies increasingly influence political learning through data-driven practices such as personalized political content, voter micro-targeting, automated public services, and digital election monitoring. While these developments offer opportunities for innovation and efficiency in civic learning, the unregulated and ethically ungrounded use of AI poses serious challenges to democratic education, including the spread of disinformation, manipulation of political awareness, data privacy risks, and unequal access to digital learning resources. These conditions may weaken critical thinking, political autonomy, and informed participation among learners and citizens. Therefore, the integration of AI literacy, ethical digital education, and democratic values within civic education is essential to ensure that AI contributes positively to the quality of democratic learning and sustainable democracy in Indonesia.

References

Afrilia, C. A., & Geraldine, S. (2025). Penggunaan AI sebagai Atribut Kampanye dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Mahasiswa Memilih Capres dan Cawapres. Komunikologi: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial, 8(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.30829/komunikologi.v8i2.19854

Ayu, S. F., & Puspasari, P. (2024). Masa Depan Demokrasi Indonesia : Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence ( Ai ) Untuk Pemilu Yang Aman Dan Berintegritas the Future of Democracy in Indonesia : the Use of Artificial Intelligence ( Ai ) for Safe and Integrity. 50(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.55981/jmi.2024.8696

Behavior, V., & Shahid, W. F. (2025). Social science review archives. 757–772.

Caiza, G., Sanguña, V., Tusa, N., Masaquiza, V., Ortiz, A., & Garcia, M. V. (2024). Navigating Governmental Choices: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on Decision-Making. Informatics, 11(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030064

Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge University Press.

Dahl, R. A. (2008). Democracy and its Critics. Yale university press.

Decker, H. (2025). The role of content personalisation in political social media campaigning: a review of political microtargeting. Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft, 35(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-025-00410-3

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., & Rossi, F. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2022). Legitimacy of Algorithmic Decision-Making: Six Threats and the Need for a Calibrated Institutional Response. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac008

Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford university press.

Lim, J. E., & Savulescu, J. (2025). AI preference prediction and policy making. AI and Society, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02474-9

McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication. Routledge.

Rafif, F. A., Marsheila, F., & Rushufah, R. R. (2024). Pengaruh Pemilu.Ai Sebagai Platform Data Politik Digital Berbasis Ai Dan Big Data Terhadap Kesuksesan Kampanye Politik Di Indonesia. Journal of Social Contemplativa, 2(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.61183/jsc.v2i1.76

Rolando, B., Ariyanto, K., Alexia, K. R., & Hartanti, R. (2022). Peran AI dan Big Data dalam Mengoptimalkan Strategi Pemasaran Digital. Journal Dinamika Publika, 1(1), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Khaz , F. H., Dewi, A. M., Cantika, D., Desvita, B., & Nazla, H. Z. (2025). Artificial Intelligence, Digital Civic Education, and Their Implications for Democratic Quality in Indonesia. Global Education Journal, 3(3), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i3.1255

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.