A Comprehensive Review of Collaborative Learning Approaches in General Education

Authors

  • Gusma Afriani Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Nurul Zaman Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i2.1202

Keywords:

Collaborative Learning, Constructivism, General Education, Pedagogy

Abstract

Collaborative learning has become an essential pedagogical approach in modern education, emphasizing active participation, shared responsibility, and social interaction among learners. However, despite its theoretical promise, its application in general education remains inconsistent and often limited to superficial group work. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of collaborative learning approaches in general education by systematically reviewing empirical and conceptual studies published between 2010 and 2025. Using a systematic literature review method, data were collected from reputable databases such as Scopus, ERIC, and ScienceDirect, and analyzed through thematic content analysis. The results reveal that collaborative learning effectively enhances students’ cognitive, social, and emotional development when guided by well-structured pedagogy, teacher facilitation, and supportive classroom culture. The findings also highlight challenges in assessment, teacher readiness, and cultural adaptation, particularly in non-Western educational contexts. It concludes that collaborative learning, when grounded in constructivist and socio-cultural theories, holds significant potential to transform general education into an inclusive and student-centered learning environment. This study contributes by offering theoretical integration, practical insights, and recommendations for developing context-sensitive and equitable collaborative learning models.

References

Abbasi, I. S., & Alghamdi, N. G. (2015). The prevalence, predictors, causes, treatments, and implications of procrastination behaviors in general, academic, and work setting. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 7(1), 59.

Amali, N. A. K., Ridzuan, M. U. M., Rahmat, N. H., Seng, H. Z., & Mustafa, N. C. (2023). Exploring learning environment through Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 144–162.

Azizah, N., Zain, A. L., & Marsela, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of the Probing Prompting Learning Model on the Learning Outcomes of Fiqh at Vocational High School: Fa’āliyyah Namūzaj al-Ta’allum al-Muwajjah al-Iqtiṣā’i fī Makhrjāt Ta’allum al-Fiqhi fī al-Madrasah al-Mihniyyah. Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education, 4(1), 194–205.

Capone, R. (2022). Blended learning and student-centered active learning environment: A case study with STEM undergraduate students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 210–236.

Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Thacker, I. (2021). A comparison of perceived and observed learning from professional development: Relationships among self-reports, direct assessments, and teacher characteristics. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 138–151.

Dogan, M. E., Goru Dogan, T., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in online learning and distance education processes: A systematic review of empirical studies. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3056.

Fransiska, F. W. (2022). The Implementation of Google Classroom to Teach English Nursing in Pandemic Era Covid19. ELT-Lectura, 9(1), 67–74.

Haryati, S., Sukarno, S., Siswanto, S., & Trisnowati, E. (2024). Trends in Religious-Based School Selection: Analysis of Parental Motivation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 4439–4449.

Herut, A. H., & Gorfu, Y. A. (2024). Academic procrastination among PhD students in Ethiopia: An examination of prevalence, associated factors and coping mechanisms. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100854.

Khaeruniah, A. E., Supiana, S., & Nursobah, A. (2024). The Processes of Memorizing the Qur’an Program as An Optimization of Islamic Religious Education Learning in Shaping the Noble Morals of Students. Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 7(2), 243–262.

Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Inclusive economic growth: Relationship between energy and governance efficiency. Energies, 16(6), 2511.

Neolaka, Y. A. B., Lawa, Y., Naat, J., Riwu, A. A. P., Mango, A. W., Darmokoesoemo, H., Widyaningrum, B. A., Iqbal, M., & Kusuma, H. S. (2022). Efficiency of activated natural zeolite-based magnetic composite (ANZ-Fe3O4) as a novel adsorbent for removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 18, 2896–2909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.153

Ouyang, F., Xu, W., & Cukurova, M. (2023). An artificial intelligence-driven learning analytics method to examine the collaborative problem-solving process from the complex adaptive systems perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 39–66.

Pandey, N., de Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(2), e422.

Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418.

Purwati, N., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Increasing Islamic Junior High School Students Learning Outcomes through Integration of Science Learning and Islamic Values. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 841–854.

Rosada, A. (2023). The Effect of Applying the Probing Prompting Learning Model Based on a Scientific Approach to Student Learning Outcomes in Social Arithmetic Mathematics Learning. Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER), 4(3), 49–53.

Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 573–593.

Saputra, I. B., Nahar, S., & Zein, A. (2023). Patterns Of Educative Interaction In The Quran And Its Contribution To Islamic Education (Study Of Stories In The Quran). Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(04).

Scheel, L., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2022). The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students’ acceptance of digital learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 44.

Sølvik, R. M., & Glenna, A. E. H. (2022). Teachers’ potential to promote students’ deeper learning in whole-class teaching: An observation study in Norwegian classrooms. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 343–369.

Welsh, R. O., & Little, S. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794.

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students’ motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 29.

Yeh, Y.-L., & Lan, Y.-J. (2018). Fostering student autonomy in English learning through creations in a 3D virtual world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 693–708.

Zakiyah, B. Z., Ummah, W. R., Zakiyah, Z. U., Muarifah, L., & Agoro, S. (2024). Implementation of the Project-Based Experiential Learning Model in Religious Education at Elementary Schools. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 5(3), 253–264.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Gusma Afriani, & Zaman, N. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Collaborative Learning Approaches in General Education . Global Education Journal, 3(2), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i2.1202

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.