STEM Learning Method (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in Enhancing Student Competency: A Case Study at SDN Sempur. Plered. Purwakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i3.1266Keywords:
Method; STEM; Competence; Critical ThinkingAbstract
This research aims to find and analyze the implementation of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) learning methods in improving student competence. The researcher uses a qualitative research paradigm with a case study approach. A sample of 22 (total sampling) educators used a structured questionnaire instrument. The results of the study showed that (1) The level of initial understanding and commitment of educators to STEM methods reached 99%; (2) Practically 21 respondents have applied this method and (99%) believe that the STEM approach is very effective in improving students' critical thinking, creativity, analytical, and complex problem-solving skills; (3) The phenomenon of polarizing experience 11 (50%) of respondents still faces technical obstacles in its implementation; (4)Phase C (Grades 5-6) was identified as the most optimal level for STEM reinforcement with a percentage of 54.5%. This study concludes that STEM learning methods can improve student competence.
References
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP). (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T. W., & Mattos, M. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work (3rd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Solution Tree Press.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan pengembangan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5). Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: What form? What function?. Currity Publications.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Harvard Business Press.
Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. Viking Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The many faces of readiness: Why and how we should measure teachers' preparedness to use technology for learning. Computers & Education, 121, 1-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
Subramaniam, M., Ahn, J., Fleischmann, K. R., & Druin, A. (2012). Reimagining the role of school libraries in specialized STEM high schools: A response to the National Academy of Sciences report. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 44(3), 166-182.
Sudarisman, U. (2015). Memahami etika dalam penelitian. Jurnal Sosialisasi: Jurnal Hasil Pemikiran, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Keilmuan Sosiologi, 2(1), 1-10.
Suharyanto H Soro (2023). Cara Mudah Memahami dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif, 36
Suharyanto H Soro (2024). Kata Siapa Pendidikan itu Penting? 7-8
Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project-based learning approach. Carnegie Mellon University.
Vande Corput, A. D., & Brunger, A. G. (2021). Professional development for STEM teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-15.
Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nana Herdiana Abdul Rahman, Suharyanto Soro, Andi Saleh, Lilih Nurmilah, Dian Rini Handayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
