Analysis of Implicatures in TikTok User Interactions: A Pragmatic Study of Comments on the Mamanya Kamari Account

Authors

  • Alse Mbatono Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Yunidar Yunidar Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Julia Marfuah Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Ulinsa Ulinsa Tadulako University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1694

Keywords:

Comments, Implications, Pragmatic, Tiktok

Abstract

The development of technology in this digital era has made communication more complex and dynamic. This study aims to describe the types and meanings of implications in TikTok user interactions on Mamanya Kamari's account based on a pragmatic study. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with data in the form of TikTok user comments that contain implications. The data collection technique uses observation, documentation and recording techniques, namely by capturing the screen of the words that are the source of the data, carefully recording the relevant words or sentences from the existing data source. Data analysis techniques use data collection models, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawn. The results of the study showed that 20 implication data were found consisting of 10 conventional implications and 10 conversational implications. Conventional implication is characterized by the use of certain words such as but, but, though, and  even those that directly contain additional meanings in speech. Meanwhile, the implications of the conversation arise based on the context of the situation, the intention of the speaker, and the mutual understanding between the speaker and the reader. The meaning of the implications found includes praise, humor, sarcasm, criticism, and emotional expression. In addition, the use of emojis in comments plays a role in strengthening meaning, expressing emotions, and helping to clarify the meaning of speech. Thus, the implications in TikTok's comments show that digital communication is not only informative, but also expressive and contextual.

References

Al Zidjaly, N. (2022). Digital discourse and social media communication. Routledge.

Aznah, A., & Aprilia, S. (2024). Analisis implikatur percakapan komentar netizen dalam postingan kecelakaan truk bermuatan durian terbalik di jalur tol pada akun @medantalk. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(1), 55–67.

Azizah, K., & Lakson, K. (2022). Implikatur dalam podcast Deddy Corbuzier bersama Retno Marsudi di media sosial YouTube: Kajian pragmatik. Jurnal Pragmatik Indonesia, 7(2), 120–132.

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

Danesi, M. (2020). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Academic.

DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Indonesia. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com

Dynel, M. (2021). Pragmatics of social media communication. Internet Pragmatics, 4(2), 125–140.

Evans, V. (2017). The emoji code: How smiley faces, love hearts and thumbs up are changing the way we communicate. Picador.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Hidayat, A., & Rahmawati, N. (2023). Implikatur dalam komunikasi digital pada media sosial Instagram. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 41(2), 145–159.

Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Waveland Press.

Mulyana. (2005). Kajian wacana: Teori, metode, dan aplikasi prinsip-prinsip analisis wacana. Tiara Wacana.

Nasrullah, R. (2023). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi (Edisi revisi). Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Riordan, M. A. (2021). Emojis as tools for communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(3), 305–328.

Tagg, C., & Evans, M. (2020). Message and social media communication. Routledge.

We Are Social. (2025). Digital 2025: Global overview report. We Are Social & Meltwater. https://wearesocial.com

Yule, G. (2014). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yunidar. (2010). Pengaruh faktor sosial dan budaya terhadap penggunaan bahasa masyarakat. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(2), 45–53.

Yus, F. (2022). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Mbatono, A., Yunidar, Y., Marfuah, J., Syamsuddin, S., & Ulinsa, U. (2026). Analysis of Implicatures in TikTok User Interactions: A Pragmatic Study of Comments on the Mamanya Kamari Account. Global Education Journal, 4(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1694

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.