Analysis of Ambidexterity Leadership in Promoting Policy Networks for Marketing Innovation

Authors

  • Dean Herdesviana Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Ahmad Farabi Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Maswanto Maswanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/jess.v4i2.969

Keywords:

Ambidextrous Leadership, Policy Networks, Marketing Innovation, Exploitative Strategies, Dynamic Capabilities

Abstract

This study investigates the role of ambidextrous leadership in driving marketing innovation through the strategic building and leveraging of policy networks. In an era of rapid market change, organizations face the critical challenge of balancing the exploration of new opportunities with the exploitation of existing advantages. Using a qualitative multiple case study approach, data was collected through in-depth interviews with senior marketing executives and innovation managers, participatory observations, and document analysis. The data was processed using NVivo 12 software, revealing distinct thematic patterns. The findings demonstrate that leaders who successfully employ ambidextrous behaviors proactively exploring new network connections (31% frequency) while efficiently exploiting existing relationships (28% frequency) significantly enhance their organization’s marketing innovation capabilities. These leaders act as pivotal architects of external networks, translating policy insights into competitive marketing strategies. However, the implementation faces challenges, including cross-sector collaboration barriers (11%) and resource allocation tensions (8%). Sentiment analysis further reflects these complexities, showing predominantly positive perceptions (67 documents) tied to strategic adaptability, alongside concerns about bureaucratic complexity (28 documents). The study contributes theoretically by extending ambidextrous leadership theory into the external domain of policy network management. Practically, it offers managers a framework for developing leadership capabilities that navigate dual imperatives, while providing policymakers insights into designing more effective innovation ecosystems. Ultimately, the research confirms that ambidextrous leadership is a vital dynamic capability for transforming policy network engagement into sustained marketing innovation.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity In Social Exchange (pp. 267–299). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

Ahmed, M. A. O., Zhang, J., Fouad, A. S., Mousa, K., & Nour, H. M. (2025). The Dark Side of Leadership: How Toxic Leadership Fuels Counterproductive Work Behaviors Through Organizational Cynicism and Injustice. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010105

Ajmal, M., Sareet, Z., & Islam, A. (2024). Unleashing innovation through employee voice behavior in the hotel industry: the impact of ambidextrous leadership on innovative work behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-08-2023-0564

Amankwaa, A., Gyensare, M. A., & Susomrith, P. (2019). Transformational leadership with innovative behaviour: Examining multiple mediating paths with PLS-SEM. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2018-0358

Ariprabowo, T., & Marita Sari, D. (n.d.). IRJ: Innovation Research Journal The Role of Motivation, Work Discipline and Training in Improving Employee Performance.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001

Bilal, M., Chaudhry, S., Amber, H., Shahid, M., Aslam, S., & Shahzad, K. (2021). Entrepreneurial leadership and employees’ proactive behaviour: Fortifying self determination theory. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030176

Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug027

Brinkmann, S. , & K. S. (2015). I. L. the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed. ). Sage. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing . SAGE, 3rd ed.

Capano, G., Galanti, M. T., Ingold, K., Petridou, E., & Weible, C. M. (2025). Theorizing the functions and patterns of agency in the policymaking process. Policy Sciences, 58(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09563-4

Carmona-Cobo, I., Garrosa, E., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2021). Workers’ observation of uncivil leadership: Is tolerance for workplace incivility a gendered issue? Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116111

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Dagher, J., Boustani, N. M., & Khneyzer, C. (2024). Unlocking HRM Challenges: Exploring Motivation and Job Satisfaction within Military Service (LAF). Administrative Sciences, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14040063

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Farhan, W., Chaudhry, I. S., Razmak, J., & El Refae, G. A. (2024). Leaders’ behavioral approach in the digital era: task vs relationship. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 11(1), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2022-0145

Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Llopis, O., & Alegre, J. (2022). Speeding up new product development through entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs: The moderating role of ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.015

Fu, H., Chen, W., Huang, X., Li, M., & Köseoglu, M. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage, ambidexterity structure, and new venture growth: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism sector. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102355

Geys, B., Connolly, S., Kassim, H., & Murdoch, Z. (2020). Follow the Leader? Leader Succession and Staff Attitudes in Public Sector Organizations. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13189

Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job Insecurity: Toward Conceptual Clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4279673

Hadi, N. U., & Sheikh, S. A. (2024). Fostering hotel ambidexterity through knowledge-sharing culture and knowledge-sharing behavior: a study of the hospitality sector in Pakistan. Business Process Management Journal, 30(4), 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2023-0801

Hossain, S., Fernando, M., & Akter, S. (2025). Digital Leadership: Towards a Dynamic Managerial Capability Perspective of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Leader Capabilities. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 32(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518251319624

Ijigu, A. W., Alemu, A. E., & Kuhil, A. M. (2022). The mediating role of employee ambidexterity in the relationship between high-performance work system and employee work performance: An empirical evidence from ethio-telecom. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135220

Imam Ghozali. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jiang, Y., Asante, D., Zhang, J., & Ampaw, E. M. (2023). The influence of ambidextrous leadership on the employee innovative behavior: an empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Current Psychology, 42(11), 9452–9465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02233-1

Kebede, A. G., Terefe, S. D., & Ijigu, A. W. (2024). Ambidextrous leadership and academic staff innovative behavior at Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia: the mediating role of workplace happiness. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2307564

Khairy, H. A., Baquero, A., & Al-Romeedy, B. S. (2023). The Effect of Transactional Leadership on Organizational Agility in Tourism and Hospitality Businesses: The Mediating Roles of Organizational Trust and Ambidexterity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914337

Li, M., Khan, H. S., Chughtai, M. S., & Le, T. T. (2022). Innovation Onset: A Moderated Mediation Model of High-Involvement Work Practices and Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 471–490. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S340326

Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Chen, D. (2019). Linking Ambidextrous Organizational Culture to Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Empowerment and Transformational Leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02192

Mahbubi, A. (2022). Business Model and Character of Successful Millennial Agripreneurs During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.17358/ijbe.8.3.333

Makona, A., Elias, R., Makuya, V., & Changalima, I. A. (2023). Does innovation ambidexterity influence restaurant economic performance in the post-COVID-19 era? The mediating effect of customer orientation. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2242164

Martínez-Falcó, J., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & Sánchez-García, E. (2023). The effect of organizational ambidexterity on sustainable performance: A structural equation analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry. Agribusiness. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21846

McCarthy, P., Sammon, D., & Alhassan, I. (2024). The characteristics of digital transformation leadership: Theorizing the practitioner voice. Business Horizons, 67(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.03.005

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Mohiya, M., & Sulphey, M. M. (2021). Do Saudi Arabian Leaders Exhibit Ambidextrous Leadership: A Qualitative Examination. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054496

Morf, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2024). Ups and downs in transformational leadership: A weekly diary study. European Management Journal, 42(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.007

Nazir, S., Shafi, A., Asadullah, M. A., Qun, W., & Khadim, S. (2020). Linking paternalistic leadership to follower’s innovative work behavior: the influence of leader–member exchange and employee voice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1354–1378. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0005

Nguyen, N. T., Hooi, L. W., & Avvari, M. V. (2023). Leadership styles and organisational innovation in Vietnam: does employee creativity matter? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2020-0563

Ouyang, C., Zhu, Y., & Ma, Z. (2022). Ambidextrous Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: The Role of Work Motivation and Ambidextrous Culture. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2899–2914. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S385033

Plimmer, G., Kuntz, J., Berman, E., Malinen, S., Näswall, K., & Franken, E. (2023). The negative relationships between employee resilience and ambiguity, complexity, and inter-agency collaboration. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82(2), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12587

Premru, M., Černe, M., & Buch, R. (2023). Where You Lead, I Will Follow: Leader–Member Exchange,Motivation to Lead and Employee Counterproductive Work Behavior. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231219120

Quaquebeke, N. Van, & Gerpott, F. H. (2023). The Now, New, and Next of Digital Leadership: How Artificial Intelligence (AI) Will Take Over and Change Leadership as We Know It. In Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies (Vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 265–275). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518231181731

Setthakorn, K. P. (2023). What drives performance while being far away from home? An examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) ambivalence, job embeddedness, trust, and perceived organisation support of Thai seafarers. Cogent Business and Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2285083

Sharifirad, M. S. (2013). Transformational leadership, innovative work behavior, and employee well-being. Global Business Perspectives, 1(3), 198–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40196-013-0019-2

Sudirman, B., Ohoiledwarin, G. P., Yuliana, R., Novie Citra Arta, D., & Alauddin Makassar, U. (n.d.). EFFECT OF COMPETENCE AND DISCIPLINE ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT THE EDUCATION OFFICE. Cetak) Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(9), 2023.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Tajeddini, K., Gamage, T. C., Tajdini, J., Hameed, W. U., & Tajeddini, O. (2024). Exploring the effects of service innovation ambidexterity on service design in the tourism and hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103730

Ushaka Adie, B., Tate, M., & Valentine, E. (2024). Digital leadership in the public sector: a scoping review and outlook. International Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2024.2323847

Wahab, F. A., Subramaniam, A., Ho, J. A., & Bali Mahomed, A. S. (2024). Augmenting Effect of Inclusive and Ambidextrous Leadership on Public University Academic Staffs’ Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Work Behavior. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241232761

Wang, L., Sun, Y., Li, J., Xu, Y., Chen, M., Zhu, X., & Wang, D. (2022). Effects of Ambidextrous Leadership on Employees’ Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862799

Yazdanshenas, M., & Mirzaei, M. (2023). Leadership integrity and employees’ success: role of ethical leadership, psychological capital, and psychological empowerment. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(4), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2022-0117

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Yogi, W., Permana, R., Kusumawijaya, I. K., Luh, N., & Antari, S. (2025). Motivation as a Mediator of Communication and Work Discipline on Employee Performance : A Study at Karangasem Hospital 1. In Online) Journal of Management and Business Innovations (Issue 01).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

How to Cite

Herdesviana, D. ., Farabi, A. ., & Maswanto, M. (2025). Analysis of Ambidexterity Leadership in Promoting Policy Networks for Marketing Innovation. Journal of Economics and Social Sciences (JESS), 4(2), 971-984. https://doi.org/10.59525/jess.v4i2.969