The Role of Educational Unit Companions to Increase Transparency and Accountability in the Governance of BOS Funds

Authors

  • Suharyanto H. Soro Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Rike Junia Ningarumsari Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Suqya Rahmah Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i2.758

Keywords:

Educational unit companion; BOS funds; accountability; Transparency

Abstract

Transparency and accountability are one of the important issues and problems in the management of School Operational Assistance Funds (BOS). School operational assistance funds are used to support the creation of effective and superior schools. This study aims to find and analyze the role of Education Unit Companions (PSP) in improving the governance of BOS Funds in Paseh District, Bandung Regency. The approach used is a case study with triangulation techniques through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that PSP has a strategic role in five main stages, namely: identification of needs, planning assistance, implementation of assistance, evaluation and reflection, as well as reporting and follow-up. The role of PSP can improve school compliance with regulations, strengthen accountability and encourage participation of education stakeholders. The conclusion of this study is that the assistance policy can be an effective tool in reforming education financial governance at the local level.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

BAPPENAS. (2019). Evaluation of the School Operational Assistance Fund (BOS) Program. Jakarta: BAPPENAS.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72 , 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011

Kurniawati, T., & Azizah, L. (2023). Implementation of good governance in educational financial management. Journal of Educational Science and Policy, 9 (1), 67–78.

Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services . Bristol: Policy Press.

Prananda, R., & Lestari, N. (2020). Strengthening accountability for BOS fund management through school-based mentoring. Journal of Educational Accountability, 8 (1), 33–42.

Putra, ES, & Yuningsih, H. (2019). Implementation of Village Fund Allocation (ADD) Policy Based on Community Participation in Villages. Journal of Government Science: Studies, Theories and Government Issues, 14(1), 1-15.

Setiawan, H. (2021). Evaluation of the BOS fund program and challenges to elementary school financial transparency. Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 12 (3), 245–259.

Suharyanto H. Soro (2024). Easy Ways to Understand and Conduct Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Bandung: Semiotics

Suharyanto, H. Soro (2024). Who Says Education is Important? . Cimahi, West Java: PT. Innovation Work Mahendra (INKARA).

Suparlan, P. (2008). Becoming an Effective Teacher . Yogyakarta: Hikayat Publishing

Wibowo, A., & Nasution, M. (2022). The role of stakeholders in supervising BOS funds in secondary schools. Nusantara Journal of Educational Administration, 5 (2), 104–115.

World Bank. (1994). Governance: The World Bank's experience . Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Yuliana, D. (2024). Increasing transparency and community participation through school mentoring. Journal of Educational Transformation, 7 (1), 12–24.

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

H. Soro , S. ., Ningarumsari , R. J. ., & Rahmah, S. (2025). The Role of Educational Unit Companions to Increase Transparency and Accountability in the Governance of BOS Funds. Global Education Journal, 3(2), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i2.758