Analysis of Student Creativity and Learning Interest in the Rural and Urban History Course in the Even Semester
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1304Keywords:
Learning Interest, Rural and Urban History Course, Student CreativityAbstract
Learning creativity can train students to be independent. This study aims to provide a comprehensive description of student creativity and learning interest in the rural and urban history course in the even semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The research method used was descriptive with a qualitative approach. The research techniques used were direct communication, indirect communication, and documentation. The research tools included observation guides, interview guides, and learning documents. The results of the study indicate, among other things: 1) Student learning creativity in the rural and urban history course is generally quite good, as evidenced by students demonstrating creative attitudes. 2) Factors influencing student learning creativity include encouragement from the students themselves, environmental encouragement, which is the most important factor in supporting student learning creativity, and the lecturer's attitude toward student creativity. 3) Interest in the rural and urban history course is quite high because the topic is close to social reality and the course provides a fresh perspective and is not boring. This is because there are always new stories and unique tales about villages and cities from the students' hometowns.
References
Ahsanuddin, Mohammad. Analysis of TOAFL Results of Arabic Literature Students, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang. January 1, 2016.
Heriyanto, Heriyanto, and Rizki Nurislaminingsih. “From Code to Theme: Coding Techniques for Qualitative Researchers.” Anuva: Journal of Cultural, Library, and Information Studies, 9, no. 2 (2025): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.9.2.295-303.
Aditama Roestiyah N.K. (2010). Strategi Belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Agus S, (2009) Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta
Alman Baarbara dan Freeman S. (2010). Menjadi guru kreatif. Yogyakarta :Golden Book.
AM, Sardiman. (2014). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2006) Permendiknas RI No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta
Bean. R .(2012). Cara mengembangkanKreativitasAnak. Tanggerang: Bina RupaAksara.
Beetlestone, F. (2013). Creative Learning (philadelpia:open university): Nusa Media.
Dananjaya, utomo. (2013).Media Pembelajaran Aktif. Bandung Nuansa Cendikia.
Guiford, (2001) Theory & Practice in Clinical Social Work
Imam Gunawan, (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta:PT. BumiAksara.
Ismaun, (2005). Sejarah sebagai Ilmu. Bandung: Historia Utama Press
Jeef Degraf dan Kheterine, (2002) Creativi ty at Work: Developing the right Practices to make Innovation Happen. San Fransisco: University of Michigan Business School Menegement series, Jossey-Bass a Wiley Company
Kemendiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2010 tentang sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Kochar, (2008) Pembelajaran Sejarah (Teaching Of History)
Munandar , U. (2014). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta:RinekaCipta.
Nawawi, H. (2012). Metode Peneltian BidangSosial. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press.
Nova, (2014) Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving
Slameto, (2013). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Sudarma, Momon: (2013). Mengembangkan Berpikir Kreatif. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo.
Sugiyono, (2017). Metode Penelitia Kuantitatif Kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suprijono, A. (2011). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
Sutopo,(2006). metodologi penelitian Kualitatif dasar teori dan terapannya dalam penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas sebelas maret.
Wiyanda Vera Nurfajriani, Muhammad Wahyu Ilhami. Data Triangulation in Qualitative Data Analysis. Zenodo, September 30, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.13929272.
Zhang, Wenxia, and Meihua Liu. "Investigating Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use during an English Proficiency Test." Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching 4, no. 2 (2008): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v4i2.1573.
Zheng, Ying, and Liying Cheng. "How does anxiety influence language performance? From the perspectives of foreign language classroom anxiety and cognitive test anxiety." Language Testing in Asia 8 (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0065-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pujo Sukino, Sahid Hidayat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



