Chaos in Freedom: Understanding Positive and Negative Freedom through Classroom Disorder and Montessori Education

Authors

  • Kalea Humayraa Nasution Cendekia Harapan School, Bali
  • Putu Ega Yudia Mastika Cendekia Harapan School, Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1461

Keywords:

Freedom, Classroom order, Isaiah Berlin, Montessori education, Qualitative study

Abstract

Freedom is commonly associated with choice, agency, and personal growth, yet everyday classroom experience shows that freedom without structure can quickly become disorder. This study examines how freedom can be used responsibly in educational settings by interpreting a classroom incident of disruption through Isaiah Berlin’s distinction between positive and negative liberty and Maria Montessori’s principle of freedom within order. The study asks three questions: why freedom sometimes leads to disorder in group settings, how rules and guidance make freedom meaningful, and what educational insight can be drawn from Berlin and Montessori for managing freedom productively. Using a qualitative design, the study draws on classroom observation, a focused literature review, and Socratic interviews with five classmates. The findings indicate that unstructured freedom initially produced excitement but rapidly evolved into noise, confusion, and reduced mutual consideration. Interpreted through Berlin, the classroom displayed “freedom to” act without sufficient “freedom from” disruption. Interpreted through Montessori, the episode illustrates that choice becomes educationally valuable only within a prepared environment shaped by norms, routines, and responsibility. The study contributes a child-centered and theoretically grounded account of why rules do not necessarily limit freedom, but can instead make meaningful freedom possible in classroom life.

References

Berlin, I. (2002). Two Concepts of Liberty. In I. Berlin & E. by H. Hardy (Eds.), Liberty (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989X.003.0004

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682

Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori Education. Science, 313(5795), 1893–1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362

Mammadov, S., & Schroeder, K. (2023). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between autonomy support and positive learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75, 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102235

Montessori, M. (1995). The Absorbent Mind. Henry Holt and Company.

Patall, E. A., Yates, N., Lee, J., Chen, M., Bhat, B. H., Lee, K., Beretvas, S. N., Lin, S., Man Yang, S., Jacobson, N. G., Harris, E., & Hanson, D. J. (2024). A meta-analysis of teachers’ provision of structure in the classroom and students’ academic competence beliefs, engagement, and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 59(1), 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2274104

Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending Teacher Autonomy Support and Provision of Structure in the Classroom for Optimal Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2

Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005a). Middle School Students’ Motivation and Quality of Experience: A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional School Environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1086/428885

Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005b). The Social Context of Middle School: Teachers, Friends, and Activities in Montessori and Traditional School Environments. The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/496907

Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy‐Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

Yang, D., Chen, P., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Huang, R. (2022). Teachers’ autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955

Downloads

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

Nasution, K. H., & Mastika, P. E. Y. (2026). Chaos in Freedom: Understanding Positive and Negative Freedom through Classroom Disorder and Montessori Education. Global Education Journal, 4(1), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1461

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.