Chaos in Freedom: Understanding Positive and Negative Freedom through Classroom Disorder and Montessori Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1461Keywords:
Freedom, Classroom order, Isaiah Berlin, Montessori education, Qualitative studyAbstract
Freedom is commonly associated with choice, agency, and personal growth, yet everyday classroom experience shows that freedom without structure can quickly become disorder. This study examines how freedom can be used responsibly in educational settings by interpreting a classroom incident of disruption through Isaiah Berlin’s distinction between positive and negative liberty and Maria Montessori’s principle of freedom within order. The study asks three questions: why freedom sometimes leads to disorder in group settings, how rules and guidance make freedom meaningful, and what educational insight can be drawn from Berlin and Montessori for managing freedom productively. Using a qualitative design, the study draws on classroom observation, a focused literature review, and Socratic interviews with five classmates. The findings indicate that unstructured freedom initially produced excitement but rapidly evolved into noise, confusion, and reduced mutual consideration. Interpreted through Berlin, the classroom displayed “freedom to” act without sufficient “freedom from” disruption. Interpreted through Montessori, the episode illustrates that choice becomes educationally valuable only within a prepared environment shaped by norms, routines, and responsibility. The study contributes a child-centered and theoretically grounded account of why rules do not necessarily limit freedom, but can instead make meaningful freedom possible in classroom life.
References
Berlin, I. (2002). Two Concepts of Liberty. In I. Berlin & E. by H. Hardy (Eds.), Liberty (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989X.003.0004
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori Education. Science, 313(5795), 1893–1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362
Mammadov, S., & Schroeder, K. (2023). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between autonomy support and positive learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75, 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102235
Montessori, M. (1995). The Absorbent Mind. Henry Holt and Company.
Patall, E. A., Yates, N., Lee, J., Chen, M., Bhat, B. H., Lee, K., Beretvas, S. N., Lin, S., Man Yang, S., Jacobson, N. G., Harris, E., & Hanson, D. J. (2024). A meta-analysis of teachers’ provision of structure in the classroom and students’ academic competence beliefs, engagement, and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 59(1), 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2274104
Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending Teacher Autonomy Support and Provision of Structure in the Classroom for Optimal Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005a). Middle School Students’ Motivation and Quality of Experience: A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional School Environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1086/428885
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005b). The Social Context of Middle School: Teachers, Friends, and Activities in Montessori and Traditional School Environments. The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/496907
Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy‐Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
Yang, D., Chen, P., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Huang, R. (2022). Teachers’ autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kalea Humayraa Nasution, Putu Ega Yudia Mastika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



