Analysis of Student Creativity and Learning Interest in the Rural and Urban History Course in the Even Semester

Authors

  • Pujo Sukino Universitas PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Sahid Hidayat Universitas PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1304

Keywords:

Learning Interest, Rural and Urban History Course, Student Creativity

Abstract

Learning creativity can train students to be independent. This study aims to provide a comprehensive description of student creativity and learning interest in the rural and urban history course in the even semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The research method used was descriptive with a qualitative approach. The research techniques used were direct communication, indirect communication, and documentation. The research tools included observation guides, interview guides, and learning documents. The results of the study indicate, among other things: 1) Student learning creativity in the rural and urban history course is generally quite good, as evidenced by students demonstrating creative attitudes. 2) Factors influencing student learning creativity include encouragement from the students themselves, environmental encouragement, which is the most important factor in supporting student learning creativity, and the lecturer's attitude toward student creativity. 3) Interest in the rural and urban history course is quite high because the topic is close to social reality and the course provides a fresh perspective and is not boring. This is because there are always new stories and unique tales about villages and cities from the students' hometowns.

References

Ahsanuddin, Mohammad. Analysis of TOAFL Results of Arabic Literature Students, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang. January 1, 2016.

Heriyanto, Heriyanto, and Rizki Nurislaminingsih. “From Code to Theme: Coding Techniques for Qualitative Researchers.” Anuva: Journal of Cultural, Library, and Information Studies, 9, no. 2 (2025): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.9.2.295-303.

Aditama Roestiyah N.K. (2010). Strategi Belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Agus S, (2009) Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta

Alman Baarbara dan Freeman S. (2010). Menjadi guru kreatif. Yogyakarta :Golden Book.

AM, Sardiman. (2014). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2006) Permendiknas RI No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta

Bean. R .(2012). Cara mengembangkanKreativitasAnak. Tanggerang: Bina RupaAksara.

Beetlestone, F. (2013). Creative Learning (philadelpia:open university): Nusa Media.

Dananjaya, utomo. (2013).Media Pembelajaran Aktif. Bandung Nuansa Cendikia.

Guiford, (2001) Theory & Practice in Clinical Social Work

Imam Gunawan, (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta:PT. BumiAksara.

Ismaun, (2005). Sejarah sebagai Ilmu. Bandung: Historia Utama Press

Jeef Degraf dan Kheterine, (2002) Creativi ty at Work: Developing the right Practices to make Innovation Happen. San Fransisco: University of Michigan Business School Menegement series, Jossey-Bass a Wiley Company

Kemendiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2010 tentang sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Kochar, (2008) Pembelajaran Sejarah (Teaching Of History)

Munandar , U. (2014). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta:RinekaCipta.

Nawawi, H. (2012). Metode Peneltian BidangSosial. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press.

Nova, (2014) Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving

Slameto, (2013). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Sudarma, Momon: (2013). Mengembangkan Berpikir Kreatif. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo.

Sugiyono, (2017). Metode Penelitia Kuantitatif Kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suprijono, A. (2011). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.

Sutopo,(2006). metodologi penelitian Kualitatif dasar teori dan terapannya dalam penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas sebelas maret.

Wiyanda Vera Nurfajriani, Muhammad Wahyu Ilhami. Data Triangulation in Qualitative Data Analysis. Zenodo, September 30, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.13929272.

Zhang, Wenxia, and Meihua Liu. "Investigating Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use during an English Proficiency Test." Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching 4, no. 2 (2008): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v4i2.1573.

Zheng, Ying, and Liying Cheng. "How does anxiety influence language performance? From the perspectives of foreign language classroom anxiety and cognitive test anxiety." Language Testing in Asia 8 (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0065-4.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Sukino, P. ., & Hidayat, S. (2026). Analysis of Student Creativity and Learning Interest in the Rural and Urban History Course in the Even Semester. Global Education Journal, 4(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.1304

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.